Commons Sense

House of Commons · Bill Debate

Food Bill - Amendment 4

15 April 2026 · 6 other contributors

Opened by Alice Johnson Lab Brighton, Kemptown

Environment

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Alice Johnson raised concerns about food bill - amendment 4 in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • This amendment seeks to include a requirement for all food packaging in the UK to be biodegradable by 2030.
  • Currently, only 9% of plastic is recycled in the UK.
  • The amendment aims to address the severe environmental impact of non-biodegradable packaging, including the entry of millions of tonnes of plastic into the oceans annually.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Alice Johnson Lab Brighton, Kemptown

This amendment seeks to include a requirement for all food packaging in the UK to be biodegradable by 2030. I propose this as it will significantly reduce plastic waste and help protect our environment. Currently, only 9% of plastic is recycled in the UK; my amendment aims to increase that percentage through legislative action. The environmental impact of non-biodegradable packaging is severe, with millions of tonnes of plastic entering our oceans each year. It harms wildlife and costs local councils billions annually. This measure will also support industries that are pivoting towards sustainable solutions.

Other contributors (6)
  • Bob Smith Lab Leeds Central

    I support this amendment as it aligns with the urgent need to address environmental issues. My constituency has been hit hard by plastic pollution, and businesses are already transitioning towards biodegradable packaging. This measure will help level the playing field for these companies.

  • Charlie Lee Lab Bristol West

    I agree with my colleague that this amendment is necessary to protect our environment and public health. The NHS spends significant amounts treating illnesses caused by plastic pollution; preventing the problem is far better than dealing with its consequences.

  • David Clark Con Derbyshire Dales

    While I recognise the importance of reducing plastic waste, this amendment goes too far by mandating a single solution. It risks harming businesses that cannot afford to switch overnight and could lead to market distortions. We should instead encourage voluntary measures and innovative solutions.

  • Ella Green Lab Cambridge

    I urge the Government to recognise the importance of this amendment in protecting our natural environment. My constituency has been leading on sustainable practices, but without a national mandate, many businesses are hesitant to invest.

  • Frank Brown Lab Newcastle upon Tyne East

    This amendment is crucial for the future of our environment and public health. Plastic pollution affects every corner of the UK, from rural areas to urban centres. We must act now before it's too late.

  • Grace White Lab Oldham West and Royton

    I support this amendment because it is a step towards reducing the environmental impact of our food packaging. Businesses in my constituency are already adopting biodegradable solutions, but they need legislative support to overcome financial barriers.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy