Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Point of Order

23 February 2026 · 2 other contributors

Opened by Dave Doogan SNP Angus and Perthshire Glens

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Dave Doogan raised concerns about point of order in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Dave Doogan raised a point of order regarding the Minister for Defence Readiness and Industry's responses to urgent questions about a 245 million contract with Palantir.
  • The Minister claimed ignorance about the existence of minutes from a meeting involving Palantir, Peter Mandelson, and the Prime Minister.
  • Confirmation from the Cabinet Office in October 2025 stated that no such meeting minutes exist.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Dave Doogan SNP Angus and Perthshire Glens

On a point of order, Dave Doogan expressed concern over the Minister for Defence Readiness and Industry's responses to urgent questions about a £245 million contract awarded to Palantir. The Minister repeatedly claimed not to know whether minutes from a meeting between Palantir, Peter Mandelson, and the Prime Minister existed, despite confirmation from the Cabinet Office in October 2025 that no such minutes exist.

Other contributors (2)
  • Dave Doogan SNP Angus and Perthshire Glens

    On a point of order, Dave Doogan questioned whether MPs should continue to accept the briefing from Ministers who claim not to know information that other parts of the Government clearly possess.

  • Judith Cummins Lab Bradford South

    In response, Judith Cummins stated that the House expects full and frank answers from Ministers. She indicated that if a mistake has been made, it is appropriate for a Minister to publish a written correction in Hansard.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy