Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Infected Blood Inquiry Government Response 2025-05-14

14 May 2025 · 23 other contributors

Opened by Nick Thomas-Symonds Con Constituency

NHS

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Nick Thomas-Symonds raised concerns about infected blood inquiry government response 2025-05-14 in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • The Paymaster General reiterated the Government's apology for the use of infected blood and blood products.
  • The Government published their initial response on December 17, 2024, committing to a comprehensive update within a year.
  • Compensation payments totalling more than 96 million had been made by the Infected Blood Compensation Authority as of May 6, 2025.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Nick Thomas-Symonds Con Constituency

The Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office opened the debate by stating that on May 20, 2024, an apology was issued for the use of infected blood and blood products. He reiterated this apology and emphasised the need for tangible changes in response to the inquiry’s recommendations. The Government published their initial response on December 17, 2024, committing to a comprehensive update within a year. The Minister also mentioned that compensation payments totalling more than £96 million had been made by the Infected Blood Compensation Authority (IBCA) as of May 6.

Other contributors (23)
  • Mike Wood Con Kingswinford and South Staffordshire

    The shadow Minister thanked the Minister for his statement and expressed concern about the pace of compensation roll-out. He asked whether the current pace is acceptable and if additional measures are being taken to expedite payments for dying victims. Wood also inquired about progress on recommendation 6 regarding monitoring liver damage for people with hepatitis C, and on recommendation 8 concerning offering blood tests to patients who had transfusions before 1996.

  • The Government have identified £11.8 billion to pay compensation, which is a significant budget commitment. The Infected Blood Compensation Authority has adopted a test-and-learn approach and I expect a significant increase in the pace of payments going forward.

  • Andrew Cooper Lab Mid Cheshire

    Welcomed the fact that the Government have identified £11.8 billion to pay compensation, but expressed concern about the pace of payments and the clarity of evidential requirements for families to prepare for claims.

  • Sarah Olney LD Richmond Park

    Welcomed the introduction of the infected blood compensation scheme but expressed alarm at the slow roll-out, with only 106 people receiving payments. Raised concerns about delays in evidence gathering and called for a duty of candour on public officials to prevent similar scandals.

  • Ian Lavery Lab Blyth and Ashington

    Expressed frustration at the lack of progress with claims being processed, highlighting the stress and mental torment individuals are experiencing while waiting for their cases to be reviewed.

  • Jeremy Hunt Con Godalming and Ash

    Complimented the Paymaster General's approach but expressed concern that IBCA is not processing claims quickly enough, suggesting a target of processing more than 90% by the end of this year.

  • Damian Hinds Con East Hampshire

    Asked about the personal attention needed for the compensation scheme's effective operation and requested an update on a memorial dedicated to children infected at Treloar’s.

  • Alice Macdonald Lab Co-op Norwich North

    Emphasised urgency in processing claims, asked about updates provided to individuals making claims, and requested details on the support available for those cases.

  • Julian Lewis Con New Forest East

    Questioned about the culture of institutional defensiveness within civil service and whether there would be any criminal sanctions for those involved in denying victims compensation.

  • Jonathan Brash Lab Hartlepool

    Expressed concern regarding the entitlement to compensation for deceased victims' estates, requested a meeting to discuss Alex's case where her father died due to infected blood products.

  • Pete Wishart SNP Perth and Kinross-shire

    Asked about the discrepancy in support payments for bereaved partners with differing registration dates, requested a review of this unfairness.

  • James Naish Lab Rushcliffe

    Welcomed the funding allocated to charities by the Government and asked for clarity on steps taken to ensure the money reaches these organisations.

  • Liz Jarvis Lib Dem Eastleigh

    Asked about reassurances for Gary Webster, a Treloar’s boy with HIV and hepatitis C, regarding his eligibility for compensation before he dies.

  • Tom Collins Lab Worcester

    Addressed concerns of families in Worcester over delays in claiming support payments after losing spouses due to infected blood products.

  • Kit Malthouse Con North West Hampshire

    Asked for individual target dates for applicants contacting IBCA and questioned whether the organisation has sufficient resources to speed up processes.

  • Nick Thomas-Symonds Con Minister of State for Paymaster General, Department for Work and Pensions

    Answered questions on the progress of compensation payments, confirmed £96 million paid out so far, committed to speeding up payments, acknowledged concerns about special category mechanism and its translation into health supplemental route.

  • Responded to queries regarding specific constituents' situations, committed to investigate cases where victims feel worse off under new compensation schemes, agreed to look at correspondence for Helen's case, assured of payments starting by the end of the year.

  • Ben Lake PC Ceredigion Preseli

    Asked if victims should not be worse off in transition from interim payments to new compensation scheme, raised concerns about specific constituent who feels significantly reduced compared to previous offer under special category mechanism.

  • Gregory Stafford Con Farnham and Bordon

    Expressed concern for Helen, a constituent with stage 4B ovarian cancer whose partner died from infected blood in 1994, requested speeding up process for those affected with limited time.

  • Ian Sollom LD St Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire

    Highlighted case of a constituent infected with hepatitis C at age 15, suffering from mental and physical illness since then, questioned the lack of formal acknowledgment and support payments for unregistered victims between 1991-1996.

  • Robbie Moore Con Keighley and Ilkley

    Acknowledged Clive Smith's advocacy work, requested reassurance on compensation delivery speed and simplicity of application process for those affected by infected blood scandal.

  • Tom Gordon LD Harrogate and Knaresborough

    Asked about changes to special category mechanism affecting supplementary regulations and the provision for bringing compensation in line with those having cirrhosis, requested explanation and redress for affected cohort.

  • Tessa Munt LD Wells and Mendip Hills

    Expressed distress over special category mechanism's impact on compensation levels, highlighted cases where healthier individuals receive more compensation than those in poorer health despite same conditions being recognised by inquiry and Government experts.

Government Response

The Paymaster General reiterated the Government's commitment to addressing the infected blood scandal, acknowledging the community's concerns about compensation delays and the need for speedier delivery of full payments. He also detailed efforts on specific recommendations such as compensation funding (£500,000), charity support, and legislative changes towards a duty of candour in public services. The Government have identified £11.8 billion to pay compensation and IBCA has adopted a test-and-learn approach, which is now complete, leading to an expected significant increase in payments. The Minister emphasised the importance of holding IBCA accountable for progress. Emphasised the importance of a national memorial dedicated specifically to infected children at Treloar’s, highlighted the need for cross-UK cooperation with devolved administrations, provided updates on support schemes and compensation payments, and committed to reviewing cases where there are gaps in support. Responded to concerns regarding compensation speed, reassurance on special category mechanism translation, commitment to review and address specific constituent cases.

Shadow Response

Mike Wood

The shadow Minister expressed appreciation for the Government's progress but urged them to expedite compensation delivery and address specific recommendations, particularly concerning liver damage monitoring and testing of undiagnosed individuals.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy