Sewage 2025-04-23

Expresses disappointment at the need for a sewage leak app before swimming in local areas, highlighting five spills over Easter. Supports his colleague's push for practical solutions.

Highlights 754 sewage spills in her constituency last year and questions the effectiveness of Ofwat regulation. Advocates for replacing Ofwat to better hold water companies accountable.

Critiques CEOs of water companies receiving exorbitant bonuses despite sewage pollution issues, aligning with the motion's stance on accountability and transparency in executive pay.

Notes that Scottish nationalists are not participating in the debate despite high levels of sewage spills. Emphasises the need for action across all parts of the UK.

Highlights how privatisation has resulted in significant leakage of funds on internal shareholder loans, supporting arguments against current water company practices.

Details 49,904 hours of sewage leaks in South Devon and criticises the increase in water bills alongside pollution. Argues that privatised companies should not be allowed to continue such practices.

Addresses health impacts from sewage pollution, including sickness among those who use affected areas for recreation and the financial burden on taxpayers and the NHS. Advocates for water companies contributing financially towards addressing these issues.

The hon. Member highlighted severe pollution in her constituency's River Mole, with phosphate levels increasing by 50% and nitrates doubling. She agreed that a clean water authority is needed to protect rivers before it becomes too late.

The hon. Member acknowledged the need for stronger regulation of the water industry, pointing out fines and poor performance by Yorkshire Water but also welcoming the Government's Water (Special Measures) Act 2025 as a step forward.

The hon. Member raised concerns about the lack of local retention of money fined from water companies to improve environmental quality in affected areas, suggesting that this would lead to real improvements.

Proposes a blue flag status for rivers, chalk streams and lakes to ensure clean and healthy waters. Cites Surfers Against Sewage's concerns about the feasibility test and sewage spill statistics. Emphasises the need to protect chalk streams as unique habitats.

Acknowledges the inherited broken water system but highlights Government actions such as introducing new powers in the Water (Special Measures) Act 2025, securing £100 billion of private sector investment and conducting a review of the water sector. Defends against criticism from opposition parties.

Raises concerns about sewage dumping in the Thames affecting events like Henley Royal Regatta, asking for reassurance on addressing this issue.

Critiques Southern Water's practices, including fines and proposed water recycling plans in Fareham and Waterlooville. Asks for rejection of the proposal due to cost and trust issues.

Seeks reassurance from the Secretary of State that Labour Government will fix issues left by Conservatives, highlighting the impact on Banbury served by Thames Water.

Questions why a similar amendment to take criminal action against water companies was not accepted before the Act's passage, emphasising retrospective gleefulness of current government statements.

A constituent of Steve Reed’s constituency whose dog fell ill from swimming in the Thames contaminated with sewage.

Stresses the need for reform and criticises previous Conservative governments for failing to address water pollution issues. Mentions fines levied against Thames Water as ineffective and emphasises regulatory powers provided by the Water (Special Measures) Act 2025.

Expresses concern over a projected 35% increase in water bills by 2030, attributing it to debt servicing for the holding company that owns Yorkshire Water. Criticises Opposition parties for failing to address issues during their time in government.

Welcomes rapid action taken by the Government, criticising CEOs of water companies like Nicola Shaw at Yorkshire Water for receiving large bonuses despite record levels of sewage spills.

Highlights long-term ecological damage caused by algal blooms in lakes and the toxicity of sewage, which can lead to ecosystem damage over a prolonged period.

Addresses frustration regarding pollution from development pollutants in rivers like Botley. Requests accountability structures for water companies to answer elected representatives such as parish councils.

Concerned about rare chalk streams being damaged by sewage spills, suggesting that Thames Water should prioritise lining pipes near these ecologically important areas. Proposes legislation to enforce this priority.

Acknowledges the need for measures addressing nutrient neutrality in waterways due to new housing developments causing unintended consequences.

Requests further progress and details on proposed reforms and investments.

The hon. Member questions the lack of all-year-round testing for Blue Flag areas under proposed reforms. He notes that water pollution can occur during bathing seasons and suggests introducing year-round testing to address this issue.

The right hon. Lady acknowledges the need for improved monitoring of storm overflows, stating that her government increased coverage from 7% to 100%. She also highlights the Thames tideway tunnel project as an example of meaningful action. However, she criticises Labour's failure to provide a comprehensive plan or meaningful action since coming into office.

The hon. Member argues that monitoring sewage overflows is not enough; it must lead to immediate improvements in public health and environmental protection. He cites significant sewage spills in his constituency as an example of the failure of privatised water management.

The Government has taken steps such as banning bonuses for water companies that commit criminal breaches, prosecuting polluters, and setting up a plan for increased inspections. However, the Secretary of State's nervous tic prevents him from focusing on future plans.

The River Derwent in Derby was polluted by sewage 2,675 times in 2024. The right hon. Member is responsible for cutting the Environment Agency budget and leaving it without sufficient resources to combat pollution.

No extracted contribution text available for this contributor yet.

The Labour Government acted urgently to introduce the Water (Special Measures) Act, which bans bonuses for water companies not meeting high standards and introduces criminal liability. The Act also requires mandatory electronic sensors for real-time monitoring of overflows.

The laughter from Labour Members was at the idea that people should be grateful to the Conservatives for the condition they left our waterways. The Government's promises are remembered by farmers and constituents for their unfulfilled commitments.

Wessex Water was fined half a million pounds for pumping raw sewage into Clackers brook, resulting in the deaths of over 2,000 fish. The systems are struggling with increased volatility in rainfall levels.

Acknowledged similar investments made by water companies and expressed the need to address pollution from agriculture as well.

Fokkes highlighted sewage discharge issues affecting the Wye and Usk rivers in her constituency. Run-off from agriculture, industry liquid waste, and inadequate water company investment have led to high phosphate levels and unsafe bathing conditions. She praised citizen scientists for their work and commended Labour's progress on pollution reduction with £1 million allocated to the River Wye.

Celebrated the Thames tideway tunnel but noted ongoing sewage discharge problems. Emphasised citizen science efforts and grassroots movements for river cleanliness, while advocating for official agencies like the Environment Agency to take on monitoring roles. She also supported calls for better data transparency in Scotland.

Agreed with Dr Savage that reliance on grassroots groups is insufficient, advocating for official agencies like the Environment Agency to be resourced adequately.

Clarified that ownership of water companies would indeed be within scope of the Cunliffe review, countering Dr Savage's earlier statement. She emphasised the need to examine alternative models for water industry ownership.

Stressed the importance of protecting rivers in Northumberland and Hexham constituency, noting that 3,991 pollution incidents occurred in his area during 2024. He praised local campaigners like Dr Stephen Westgarth from the 'Clean Tyne' campaign for their efforts.

Expresses concern about sewage in rivers affecting her constituents, especially those engaged in water sports along the Thames. Tables amendments for criminal sanctions against executives and extended protections for aquatic sports activities.

Supports the need for stricter regulations on sewage pollution, referencing local examples such as the River Nidd in his constituency where paddleboarding and kayaking are popular activities. Criticises the lack of action by previous Conservative Governments.

Agrees with the speaker's emphasis on protecting water sports but also stresses the importance of preserving angling opportunities in rivers as a form of recreation that is vital for rural life.

Supports the Government’s measures outlined in the Water (Special Measures) Act 2025, which includes penalties for non-compliance and bans on bonuses unless high environmental standards are met. Expresses concerns about Thames Water's performance and calls for further investigations into pollution incidents.

Welcomes the Act but urges the Government to go further in protecting chalk streams from sewage dumping. Campaigns alongside local groups to improve water quality and protect river ecosystems.

Agrees on the importance of blue flag status for chalk streams due to sewage overflow issues. Mentions 3,000 hours of non-stop overflow in her constituency.

Discusses Welsh Water's high number of sewage discharges despite charging high prices. Urges the Welsh Government to hold Welsh Water accountable.

Praises Labour’s actions under the Water (Special Measures) Act 2025, highlighting the ban on unfair bonuses for water bosses and criminal charges. Mentions over £100 billion of private sector investment for infrastructure upgrades.

Argues that a blue flag system is insufficient without meaningful action or sanctions. Discusses the cost implications and benefits of public ownership over private. Suggests public ownership as the solution to address both sewage and agricultural pollution.

Calls for better regulation and investment rules, but ultimately agrees that public ownership is necessary to fix the water supply issue in his constituency where raw sewage discharge increased by 75%.

Highlights sewage pollution impacting surf sessions in Cornwall, mentioning cancellations of 10% of Wave Project’s sessions. Provides statistics on sewage spills affecting beaches along the north coast of his constituency.

Miller highlights the failure of regulatory measures, noting that Thames Water has discharged sewage for additional 1,050 hours since July. He cites local examples where residents faced severe consequences due to sewage flooding in their homes and gardens. He calls for a powerful clean water authority to enforce stricter regulations.

Pearce criticises the privatisation of water by the Thatcher and Major Governments, leading to fragmented services and excessive debt. The current Labour Government has introduced criminal liability for company executives obstructing investigations, banned bonuses, mandated real-time reporting of sewage spills, and initiated a review of the water sector.

Morello discusses the impact of raw sewage pollution on West Dorset's economy and natural environment. He calls for stronger rules, tougher enforcement, and statutory consultations with water companies on new housing developments to prevent further strain on an already failing network.

Brown-Fuller mentions a study that found high levels of pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and recreational drugs in Chichester harbour water following sewage spills. She supports the introduction of blue flag status for rivers to ensure clear standards of cleanliness and public understanding.

Hack emphasises the long-term impact on her constituents due to sewage pollution, noting that significant spills took two years to resolve due to budget cuts affecting the Environment Agency's capacity. She calls for swift and effective action from the Government.

Supports the measures proposed by the Labour Government, citing the example of Severn Trent which serves both his constituency and Amanda Hack's. He points out that despite receiving large rewards for its PR19 plan, it failed to meet water quality targets every year in the PR25 period.

Highlights the sewage discharge issue affecting her constituency with 529 discharges in 2024, totaling over 6,200 hours. She emphasises the need for decisive action to upgrade water infrastructure, enforce stricter regulations, and demand transparency from companies like Southern Water.

Questioned whether Ofwat should be scrapped due to its failure in collecting penalties despite recommending fines of £168 million. However, Alison Griffiths disagrees and insists that the fines need to be collected and distributed.

Discusses Ofwat's failures, including regulatory oversight on pollution and financial viability, as well as fairness in pricing. He emphasises the need for stricter regulation and accountability from water companies like Thames Water. Also proposes a new blue flag status to guarantee clean swimming rivers.

Supports the idea of replacing Ofwat with a Clean Water Authority that would bring together environmental and financial regulation, highlighting her constituency's sewage leakage issues.

The hon. Member argues that Ofwat is failing to innovate or push companies towards better technologies for sewage treatment despite the presence of numerous new technologies available, such as leak detection systems and trenchless pipe repair solutions.

The Minister acknowledges past failures but highlights the Labour Government’s commitment to reforming the water system, including measures under the Water (Special Measures) Act 2025 which introduces new powers to ban unfair bonuses for failing to protect the environment and imposes criminal charges for law-breaking. She also mentions £104 billion of private sector investment in infrastructure upgrades.

The hon. Member supports the Minister's stance on the Water (Special Measures) Act and its potential to hold water companies accountable for environmental damage, advocating for stricter penalties and cost recovery mechanisms.

The hon. Member acknowledges contributions from her colleagues highlighting various initiatives like the £1 million funding for research in the River Wye catchment to address pollution issues, demonstrating support for collaborative efforts across regions.

The hon. Member supports the Water (Special Measures) Act and emphasises the importance of cleaning up rivers to protect wildlife from the harmful impacts of water pollution.

I thank the hon. Member for giving notice of his point of order. He will know that Members are responsible for the accuracy of their remarks in this Chamber. He has none the less raised his concerns and I am sure they will have been heard on the Opposition Benches. If the Leader of the Opposition wishes to correct the record, there are mechanisms available for her to do so.