Veterinary Products in Waterways 2025-03-25

Opened the debate

I am delighted to secure my first Adjournment debate on veterinary products in waterways, specifically neonicotinoids such as fipronil and imidacloprid. Neonicotinoids are highly toxic and have significant impacts on aquatic ecosystems and pollinator populations, contributing to food insecurity threats. Despite bans on agricultural use since 2017 for fipronil and 2018 for imidacloprid, these chemicals continue to enter waterways through pet products, posing severe environmental risks. The economic cost of purifying contaminated water is substantial, with rising water bills affecting consumers. I call for stricter regulations on neonics and promotion of natural alternatives.

Government Response

The Minister acknowledges the importance of protecting aquatic ecosystems from neonicotinoids but does not provide specific funding announcements or policy commitments. The Government notes ongoing efforts to monitor and mitigate environmental impacts, including water testing initiatives in Switzerland and calls for further research on alternatives such as essential oils. The response emphasises the need for balance between agricultural needs and environmental protection, without detailing concrete steps towards restricting neonicotinoids or revoking emergency authorisations. The Minister congratulates the hon. Member for Tiverton and Minehead on her first Adjournment debate in the House. She acknowledges the concerns about neonics and mentions that the Government has released a national action plan on pesticides with objectives to encourage integrated pest management, establish timelines for reduction of pesticide use, and strengthen compliance. The Minister also addresses water quality issues under the Water (Special Measures) Act 2025 which boosts powers for regulators to tackle pollution by water companies. Regarding veterinary medicines in waterways, she states that all medicines undergo rigorous scientific assessment before approval and there is a cross-Government group developing a strategy to reduce impacts of substances in the environment. The group includes key governmental bodies such as the Environment Agency and the VMD. While stakeholders are divided on year-round parasiticide use versus more cautious use or a complete ban, the Government will look at all evidence for a balanced approach without impacting animal welfare and public health. There is still a critical evidence gap to understand full impacts before regulatory action is taken. The Veterinary Medicines Directorate is developing the evidence base and has commissioned scientific research to investigate how these substances reach rivers and streams. It is working closely with stakeholders to collect data and address the issue, supporting calls for a review of environmental risk assessment standards. A road map is being developed by a group on pharmaceuticals in the environment to reduce levels of two veterinary substances in UK surface waters. The priority is raising awareness and improving pet owner education on risks and appropriate use. Once finalised, this road map would be available to all stakeholders. Unresearched policies can fail badly; changes must be evidence-based and measurable for success. This Government will not turn the other way or allow rivers, lakes, and seas to be polluted. Through legislation such as the Water (Special Measures) Act 2025, the independent Water Commission, future laws, and many actions, we are committed to a comprehensive reset of the water industry. We remain dedicated to addressing the environmental impact of veterinary medicines, continuing to work with stakeholders for solutions that protect both animal health and the environment. I congratulate the hon. Member for Tiverton and Minehead on securing this debate.