Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) 2025-03-25

The Minister for Local Government and English Devolution opened the debate by expressing gratitude to Members of both Houses for their scrutiny of the Bill. He explained that the Bill is a crucial step towards transforming the business rates system into one that supports growth, sustainability, and fairness. The Minister emphasised the need for a permanent tax cut that is sustainably funded through higher multipliers applied to properties with rateable values at or above £500,000.

Mr. Hollinrake questioned whether the proposed reforms were permanent or just a first step. He sought clarity on the Government's commitment to providing long-term certainty for businesses.

Ms Braverman inquired about the impact of the Bill on pubs, highlighting that many have been struggling due to rising costs. The Minister responded by stressing the long-term support for such businesses through the measures proposed.

Mr. Vince questioned whether focusing on exemptions from business rates was an appropriate approach to supporting the manufacturing industry, suggesting that other means might be more effective.

Defended the Government's stance on the Bill, emphasising that it targets those who need support and is fully funded. Rejected Lords amendments due to potential financial unsustainability or conflicts with manifesto commitments.

Critiqued the Government's business rate changes, citing economic hardship for small businesses and decreased confidence in the economy. Supported amendments that would review rates for fulfillment warehouses and support manufacturing sectors. Highlighted Labour's broken promises on business rates reform.

The Bill is necessary to support our high streets. It strikes a fairer balance between small businesses and large, and I am pleased to have contributed during most stages of its progress. Amendments 2, 5, 8 and 11 seek to exempt anchor stores from the higher multipliers, thus reducing the revenue raised by the Bill overall. By reducing that revenue, the amendments reduce the support available to smaller retail, hospitality and leisure businesses, when providing that support is the entire purpose of this legislation.

Asked what would be said to businesses trying to make their numbers add up. Inquired about the Labour party's promise during previous elections to level the playing field between online giants and small businesses, but pointed out that many different premises are being hit by these increases.

The Bill is designed specifically to revive our high streets. The hon. Gentleman will remember, because his party was in government at the time, that our high streets were struggling and suffocating, and it is incumbent on this new Government to revive them. That is why it is so important for us to pass the Bill today.

Begins by thanking noble Lords in the other place for their work on the Bill. Expresses concern about pubs, restaurants and cafés who are wondering how they will continue with the reduction in rates relief. Tables amendments to improve the Bill and ensure it gives consideration to manufacturing facilities.

The electoral system mandates that the party with a majority delivers their manifesto pledges, even if they did not receive significant support. The Government is implementing policies such as employers’ national insurance contributions and winter fuel allowance cuts which were not in their manifesto.

The amendment will harm children attending both private and state schools, pushing hundreds or thousands of pupils into already full state schools. This measure is unforgivable as it undermines the education quality for all children.