Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Ukraine 2025-03-03

03 March 2025 · 89 other contributors

Opened by Keir Starmer Lab Holborn and St Pancras

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Keir Starmer raised concerns about ukraine 2025-03-03 in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • Called on the House to show courage in the face of Russia's invasion of Ukraine and announced a significant increase in defence spending.
  • Emphasised economic security as national security and outlined plans to create new jobs through military investment, including a 1.6 billion deal with Ukraine.
  • Met President Trump in the White House to strengthen ties with America and hosted European leaders for a summit on securing peace in Ukraine.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Keir Starmer Lab Holborn and St Pancras

Called on the House to show courage in the face of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, announced a significant increase in defence spending for the first time since the cold war. Emphasised economic security as national security and outlined plans to create new jobs through military investment, including a £1.6 billion deal with Ukraine for air defence missiles manufactured in Belfast. Met President Trump in the White House to strengthen ties with America and hosted European leaders for a summit on securing peace in Ukraine.

Other contributors (89)
  • Kemi Badenoch Con North West Essex

    Acknowledged the importance of supporting Ukraine's fight for freedom, democracy, and sovereignty. Welcomed the Prime Minister’s actions to convene European leaders and use UK Export Finance to support British jobs. Supported the uplift in defence spending to 2.5% by 2027 and beyond. Highlighted the need for details on any potential deployment of British troops and asked about plans to further utilise frozen Russian assets, sanctions on Russian-linked individuals, and ensuring Ukraine's participation in peace negotiations.

  • Emily Thornberry Lab Islington South and Finsbury

    Thornberry expressed concern that cuts to the UK's overseas aid budget could undermine efforts to secure a just peace for Ukraine. She supported the Prime Minister's leadership but questioned whether these cuts would hamper future humanitarian support.

  • Ed Davey LD Kingston and Surbiton

    Davey expressed regret over US President Trump's stance on Russia and emphasised the need for UK to reduce its dependency on the United States. He supported discussions with allies on a rearmament bank and asset seizures to support Ukraine, and urged the Prime Minister to clarify Lord Mandelson’s comments.

  • Dhesi welcomed the PM's efforts towards securing a just peace but sought assurances that the UK would work with President Trump for security guarantees and encourage NATO allies to meet their 2% GDP defence spending target.

  • James Cleverly Con Braintree

    Cleverly agreed with the PM's approach but called for a significant increase in defence spending, emphasising unity across parties on this issue and the need to signal seriousness about defending values and allies.

  • Alex Sobel Lab/Co-op Leeds Central and Headingley

    Sobel questioned the PM's plans for supporting energy projects in Ukraine, especially following the cancellation of a USAID-funded project. He asked if UK could step forward to support such initiatives using Russian assets or aid budget.

  • The debate focused on the UK's support for Ukraine, international security measures against Russia, and discussions around defence spending and aid budgets.

  • Rosena Allin-Khan Lab Tooting

    Congratulates the Prime Minister on European leadership meetings. Asks if he will continue to work closely with allies to support Ukraine and ensure peace.

  • Munira Wilson LD Twickenham

    Welcomes the Prime Minister’s statement of support for Ukraine, but raises concerns about aid budget cuts and the impact on the Middle East. Asks what representations are being made to reverse Gaza aid blockades.

  • Cat Smith Lab Lancaster and Wyre

    Congratulates the Prime Minister on his strong leadership and asks him to recommit to increasing international aid spending to 0.7% when fiscal circumstances allow.

  • Stephen Flynn SNP Aberdeen South

    Compliments the PM's support for Ukraine but disagrees with plans related to nuclear deterrents. Asks if reports of US withdrawing military aid are accurate and what impact this would have.

  • Derek Twigg Lab Widnes and Halewood

    Agrees on UK leadership in defence and security, urging the Prime Minister to consider hitting 3% spending before the next election to bolster support for Ukraine.

  • Andrew Mitchell Con Sutton Coldfield

    Compliments PM's actions in forming a coalition with European allies to counter Russia’s GDP. Emphasises the importance of self-confidence and collective security among NATO members.

  • Emma Lewell-Buck Lab South Shields

    Thanks Prime Minister for his strong leadership and asks if alongside allied efforts, they are closely monitoring Russian strategic partners during peace negotiations.

  • Helen Maguire LD Epsom and Ewell

    Welcomes the increase in defence spending but urges reversal of Conservative cuts to troop numbers. Asks for commitment against going it alone without US support.

  • Josh Fenton-Glynn Lab Calder Valley

    Thanks PM for diplomatic efforts and asks if decisions about Ukraine’s future will include its elected leadership, ensuring security guarantees are adhered to by Russian aggressors.

  • Tom Tugendhat Con Tonbridge

    Echoes thanks for leadership in forming a coalition of European allies. Asks if the PM is reaching out beyond Europe to form an international coalition against Russia.

  • Barry Gardiner Lab Brent West

    Compliments the Prime Minister's leadership but argues that rising defence spending should be achieved by changing fiscal rules, not cuts to aid budgets.

  • Nigel Farage Reform Clacton

    Acknowledges PM’s effective use of Brexit freedoms in diplomacy and asks about the security implications of America's involvement with Ukraine regarding mineral agreements. Discusses potential British troop commitments based on US aid levels.

  • Johanna Baxter Lab Paisley and Renfrewshire South

    Welcomes the Prime Minister’s statement and asks if Russia must return 19,546 children stolen from Ukraine to achieve lasting peace.

  • Roger Gale Con Herne Bay and Sandwich

    Supports the Prime Minister's position on security guarantees with Ukraine, emphasising that Putin’s Administration cannot be trusted.

  • Oliver Ryan Ind Burnley

    Praises the Prime Minister for his leadership and supports the increase in defence budget. Calls for deeper partnership with Ukraine to provide necessary support during negotiations.

  • Sammy Wilson DUP East Antrim

    Congratulates the Prime Minister on providing support to Ukraine but questions whether UK armed forces can deliver given their overstretched state, advocating for continued US involvement.

  • Perran Moon Lab Camborne and Redruth

    Appreciates the Prime Minister's leadership and emphasises the importance of unity in the House to show strength against division that Putin would exploit.

  • Bernard Jenkin Con Harwich and North Essex

    Stresses the need for diplomatic engagement with the US to ensure security guarantees, highlighting Putin's history of untrustworthiness in treaty-making.

  • Calvin Bailey Lab Leyton and Wanstead

    Acknowledges the Prime Minister’s efforts and emphasises the importance of engaging all parts of the UK with defence opportunities as well as challenges.

  • Layla Moran LD Oxford West and Abingdon

    Highlights the positive impact of UK-NHS workers in Ukraine, suggesting supercharging rehabilitation efforts for mutual benefit.

  • Richard Burgon Lab Leeds East

    Welcomes peace initiatives but expresses alarm about deploying British troops and planes, calling for a Commons vote before such decisions are made.

  • Julian Lewis Con New Forest East

    Suggests the creation of a defence industrial expansion unit to speed up military equipment production.

  • Rosie Wrighting Lab Kettering

    Reiterates support for Ukraine's sovereignty and commitment to working with allies towards peace.

  • Harriett Baldwin Con West Worcestershire

    Proposes ensuring UK oil and gas consumption predominantly comes from within the country as a matter of national security.

  • Louise Jones Lab North East Derbyshire

    Calls for strategic defence review to ensure an excellent security guarantee for Ukraine, given worsening weather conditions.

  • Adrian Ramsay Green Waveney Valley

    Welcomed the Prime Minister’s support for Ukraine and his commitment to decisions involving Ukraine, but questioned how he would ensure that the interests of Ukraine remain front and centre in peace deals given President Trump's bullying tactics.

  • Naushabah Khan Lab Gillingham and Rainham

    Agreed with the Prime Minister’s commitment to national security but raised concerns about reducing foreign aid due to increased defence spending, emphasising that without hard power backing international aid would be diminished.

  • Jeremy Hunt Con Godalming and Ash

    Supported the PM's approach in dealing with President Trump and suggested a new 3% target for European NATO countries to ramp up defence spending, showing it as temporary.

  • Jonathan Brash Lab Hartlepool

    Thanked the Prime Minister for his leadership over the week that increased support for Ukraine and requested a look into improving procurement for better equipment and support for soldiers in Ukraine.

  • Alistair Carmichael LD Orkney and Shetland

    Asked about the release of £2.5 billion from the sale of Chelsea football club meant to help Ukraine, questioning why it was frozen and not being used for its intended purpose.

  • Gordon McKee Lab Glasgow South

    Supported PM's leadership on the world stage but asked about improving procurement processes so that growing start-ups can contribute to defence with their technology.

  • Andrew Murrison Con South West Wiltshire

    Agreed that sending soldiers into Ukraine without security guarantees would be folly and emphasised the importance of forward-leaning European elements and US backing for guarantees.

  • Gregor Poynton Lab Livingston

    Thanked PM for leadership but criticised SNP leader's juvenile comments on social media, questioning their trustworthiness regarding national defence matters.

  • Liz Saville Roberts PC Dwyfor Meirionnydd

    Committed to diplomatic initiatives and emphasised that boosted defence spending should not come at the expense of international aid or public services, asking about fiscal rules for responsible investment in these areas.

  • Tulip Siddiq Lab Hampstead and Highgate

    Passed on thanks from Ukrainian refugees in her constituency to PM and asked about considerations given to young Ukrainians who have laid down roots here and want settled status.

  • Iain Duncan Smith Con Chingford and Woodford Green

    Congratulated the Prime Minister on his decision-making over the past few days, emphasising that when UK and USA are together, the world is safer. He suggested reminding President Trump about Russia's deal with North Korea.

  • Bill Esterson Lab Sefton Central

    Suggested using success in developing alternative energy technology to support Ukraine’s energy security as it defends its arrangements and works towards lasting peace.

  • Vikki Slade LD Mid Dorset and North Poole

    Welcomed the Government's commitment to increasing defence spending but was troubled by it being done entirely at the expense of overseas development aid budget, asking for an open mind on alternatives.

  • Announced job creation in Belfast linked to defence spending. Emphasised the importance of UK manufacturing and innovation for economic security. Stressed the need for coordination with European allies on ramping up spending and capability, highlighting past inefficiencies. Assured Baltic states that their interests will be represented at future discussions due to immediate threat they face from Russia.

  • Stella Creasy Lab/Co-op Walthamstow

    Expressed support for the Prime Minister's efforts in ensuring Ukraine's security and safety. Asked about conversations with European allies on reducing duplication of effort in defence plans.

  • John Whittingdale Con Maldon

    Asked if any settlement would involve acceptance of Russian occupation of parts of Ukraine’s territory, expressed concern for the Baltic states' security and exposure due to this conflict.

  • David Burton-Sampson Lab Southend West and Leigh

    Expressed gratitude towards the Prime Minister's leadership in supporting Ukraine. Stressed the importance of remaining resolute as a House for the Ukrainian people, highlighted the 100-year partnership between the UK and Ukraine.

  • George Freeman Con Mid Norfolk

    Congratulated the Prime Minister on his leadership and policy. Highlighted the importance of willing the means to fund military threat over the next five to ten years, estimated at £60 billion or possibly £70 billion.

  • Jacob Collier Lab Burton and Uttoxeter

    Asked about further actions being considered to ensure Russia pays the full financial cost of its illegal invasion. Emphasised the use of frozen Russian assets for funding Ukraine’s defence and reconstruction.

  • Lee Dillon LD Newbury

    Discussed gratitude expressed by Ukrainian people for UK's support. Highlighted the need to amend visa scheme so that Ukrainians in the UK can secure meaningful employment without time-limited visas.

  • James Frith Lab Bury North

    Praised the Prime Minister’s leadership and composure, asked for commitment towards securing the release of 20,000 children kidnapped and forcibly removed to Russia by Russian forces.

  • Graham Stuart Con Beverley and Holderness

    Congratulated the Prime Minister on his leadership but stressed the importance of resources in place to tackle the issue. Highlighted the financial and demographic position of western Europe.

  • Alan Strickland Lab Newton Aycliffe and Spennymoor

    Discussed the security interdependence between Britain, Europe, and Ukraine against Russian aggression. Emphasised the need for a unified stance against Russia to defend democracy.

  • Jim Allister TUV North Antrim

    Asked about the nature of security guarantees required from the US in comparison to article 5 of NATO, expressed appreciation for the order for Thales in Belfast.

  • Nadia Whittome Lab Nottingham East

    Complimented the Prime Minister's support for Ukraine. Asked about increased military spending specifically for re-equipping Ukraine and concerns over cutting international aid budget affecting global stability.

  • Graeme Downie Lab Dunfermline and Dollar

    Takes the cross-party consensus on Ukraine positively but calls for SNP Scottish Government action to ensure businesses in Scotland benefit from increased defence spending.

  • Richard Foord LD Honiton and Sidmouth

    Compliments Canada's contribution to Ukraine, urges Prime Minister to emphasise sovereignty during discussions with President Trump.

  • Jeevun Sandher Lab Loughborough

    Asks the Prime Minister to strengthen oil price cap on Russia and requests a meeting to discuss it further.

  • David Reed Con Exmouth and Exeter East

    Compliments the Prime Minister for leadership shown in recent days, asks him to send message of support to armed forces preparing to deploy to Ukraine.

  • Josh Dean Lab Hertford and Stortford

    Asks the Prime Minister to reassure Ukrainian community about his commitment to ending Russian invasion and bringing peace to Ukraine.

  • Lisa Smart LD Hazel Grove

    Supports seizing of Russian assets as a way to strengthen support for Ukrainian allies.

  • John Slinger Lab Rugby

    Quotes a Ukrainian constituent, stresses the importance of diplomacy and values in supporting Ukraine.

  • Mark Pritchard Con The Wrekin

    Praises the Prime Minister for his leadership and support for Ukraine, suggests UK can be a diplomatic bridge between US and Europe.

  • Noah Law Lab St Austell and Newquay

    Agrees with the decision to cut overseas development assistance in favour of defence spending but emphasises that security and economic development go hand-in-hand.

  • Chris Law SNP Dundee Central

    Questions how peace objectives can be achieved when foreign aid budget is being cut, criticises SNP for not providing a clear plan to fund increased defence spending.

  • Josh Simons Lab Makerfield

    Suggests the UK Government should rely on intelligence and less bluffing to serve national interests better by leading efforts towards world security.

  • Alberto Costa Con South Leicestershire

    Compliments Prime Minister's leadership, reiterates need for lasting peace that guarantees Ukraine’s sovereignty and security.

  • Dave Robertson Lab Lichfield

    Asked the Prime Minister what steps would be taken to ensure that European allies commit to spending 2.5% of their GDP on defence.

  • Luke Evans Con Hinckley and Bosworth

    Inquired whether the Prime Minister will remind President Trump about the importance of decency in negotiations during his next meeting with him.

  • Andrew Lewin Lab Welwyn Hatfield

    Asked about a rearmament bank concept and its implementation alongside European allies and Commonwealth friends.

  • Ben Maguire LD North Cornwall

    Suggested that the Government should introduce emergency legislation to seize Russian assets, which could directly support Ukraine's defence.

  • James Naish Lab Rushcliffe

    Complimented the Prime Minister on his leadership and praised Lithuania’s decision to provide air defence systems to Ukraine.

  • Kieran Mullan Con Bexhill and Battle

    Asked for a reconfirmation of commitment to AUKUS and an update on its progress, highlighting the importance of considering China's influence.

  • Mark Sewards Lab Leeds South West and Morley

    Commended the Prime Minister for his diplomatic efforts and asked why supporting Ukraine is in Britain’s direct national interest.

  • Neil Shastri-Hurst Con Solihull West and Shirley

    Asked what steps were being taken to discourage third nations from providing hardware to Russia, which it can use for its illegal war.

  • Clive Jones LD Wokingham

    Commented on the change in conversation by the US regarding Ukraine and questioned whether President Trump could be kept on board until a fair settlement is achieved.

  • Bradley Thomas Con Bromsgrove

    Complimented the Prime Minister for his commitment to sanctions on Russia not being lifted in case of a ceasefire and asked about measures against the shadow fleet.

  • Jeremy Corbyn Ind Islington North

    Asked under what circumstances British troops could be deployed to Ukraine and sought a guarantee that any such decision would come before the House.

  • Nick Timothy Con West Suffolk

    Inquired about individual Ministerial responsibility for offshore infrastructure security and condemned divestment campaigns against domestic defence manufacturing industries.

  • Ben Obese-Jecty Con Huntingdon

    Thanked the Prime Minister for his support to President Zelensky, asked about assurance regarding US Air Forces presence in the UK and investment in defence infrastructure.

  • Robin Swann UUP South Antrim

    Welcomed £1.6 billion investment in Thales in Belfast for air defence missiles procurement but urged the Prime Minister to also invest in armed forces personnel.

  • James MacCleary LD Lewes

    Congratulated the Prime Minister on constructive work with allies and asked how he intends to maintain positive momentum, particularly within the EU.

  • John Cooper Con Dumfries and Galloway

    Asked the Prime Minister to confirm that decisions regarding deploying British troops rest solely with him and not devolved administrations like Scotland's First Minister.

  • Calum Miller LD Bicester and Woodstock

    Expressed concern over US stepping back from counter-cyber measures against Russia, shared Prime Minister’s stance on Russian cyber-threat to NHS.

  • Tessa Munt LD Wells and Mendip Hills

    Asked the Prime Minister if military spending should prioritise outcomes rather than strictly annual budgets, suggesting a rolling average approach for defence and aid.

  • Andrew George LD St Ives

    Congratulated the PM on his actions but urged to look again at fiscal rules and consider taxing the wealthy rather than building essential investment in defence on the backs of the poorest.

  • Jim Shannon DUP Strangford

    Welcomed £1.6 billion contract for air defence missiles, expressed pride in UK's stance supporting Ukraine, and asked if support will seek to broker peace but not until right done by people of Ukraine.

Government Response

Emphasises unity of support for armed forces in Ukraine. Provides assurances on unwavering commitment to allies and aid efforts. Defends decision not to change fiscal rules and supports nuclear deterrent against Russia. Emphasises the importance of unity in the House and NATO alliance. Defends UK’s position on security guarantees, doubling down on support for Ukraine while working closely with US to ensure peace. The Prime Minister responded to all concerns with assurances about ramping up defence spending, improving procurement processes, focusing on energy security in Ukraine, and considering options related to frozen assets. He also emphasised the importance of European unity and cooperation in dealing with the United States and Russia. The Prime Minister responded to multiple queries regarding support for Ukraine, NATO relations, defence spending, diplomatic efforts, and criticism from SNP members. He emphasised the importance of coordination with allies, maintaining UK’s commitment to international values, stepping up economic pressure on Russia, and ensuring a secure future for Europe. Responded to multiple questions, emphasising the importance of Ukraine's security, European allies committing to defence spending, rearmament bank concept exploration, discouraging third nations from providing hardware to Russia, commitment to AUKUS, and reinforcing that support for Ukraine is in Britain’s national interest.

Shadow Response

Kemi Badenoch

Supported the Prime Minister’s actions to convene European leaders and use UK Export Finance to support British jobs. Welcomed the uplift in defence spending and expressed readiness for effective scrutiny on any deployment of troops. Asked about plans to utilise frozen Russian assets, sanctions, ensuring Ukraine's participation in peace negotiations, and avoiding a repeat of previous failed agreements.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy