Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministerial Statement

Relationships, Sex and Health Education: Statutory Guidance

16 May 2024 · 21 other contributors

Opened by Gillian Keegan Con Stafford

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Gillian Keegan raised concerns about relationships, sex and health education: statutory guidance in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • The Minister of State, Department for Education, Gillian Keegan, made a statement to the House setting out the Government's proposals for updating the statutory guidance on relationships, sex and health education.
  • The purpose of the updates is to ensure that children are taught age-appropriate content, respecting parental rights and preventing teachers from pushing any agendas.
  • Key changes include introducing age limits for sensitive subjects and ensuring transparency with parents about the curriculum content.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Government Statement

The Minister of State, Department for Education, Gillian Keegan, made a statement to the House setting out the Government's proposals for updating the statutory guidance on relationships, sex and health education. The purpose is to ensure that children are taught appropriate content based on their age, respecting parental rights and ensuring teachers do not push any agendas. Key changes include introducing age limits for sensitive subjects, ensuring transparency with parents about what is being taught, clearly stating gender identity as a contested topic should not be taught in schools, adding content on sexual harassment, providing guidance on suicide prevention starting from year 8, and including personal safety topics like knife crime laws. The guidance aims to give clarity to teachers, peace of mind to parents, and assurance to society that pupils are being educated appropriately for their age.

Other contributors (21)
  • Catherine McKinnell Lab Newcastle upon Tyne North

    Question

    The Shadow Minister asked the Secretary of State about the ability of teachers to respond urgently to child abuse issues, even when they arise outside proposed age limits and among younger children. She also inquired into teaching diverse family structures including transgender individuals.

    Minister reply

    The minister responded by emphasising that RSHE must be factual and appropriate for the age of students while respecting parents' rights to know what their children are learning. She clarified that gender identity should not be taught as a spectrum but rather on a factual basis at an appropriate age, without pushing contested ideologies.

  • Liam Burns Lab Rhondda

    Question

    The MP questioned the practicality of ensuring parents are fully informed and the adequacy of mental health support in schools given current guidance. He asked about potential financial implications for schools.

    Minister reply

    The minister acknowledged the importance of parent engagement and stated that the new guidance will make it clear that providers must not hide materials from parents, though she did not provide specifics on financial implications or additional funding.

  • Jessica Morden Lab Caerphilly

    Question

    The MP highlighted issues of gender identity and asked about the government's stance on teaching transgender-related topics.

    Minister reply

    The minister reiterated that the guidance clearly states that contested ideas around gender should not be taught in schools, but factual information at an appropriate age is permissible.

  • Derek Thomas Con St Ives

    Question

    The MP questioned whether there was a need for further research before making decisions on RSHE content and expressed concerns over the impact of guidance on children's education.

    Minister reply

    The minister stated that extensive research, evidence gathering, and advice from experts informed the updated guidance. She emphasised that the goal is to ensure factual and appropriate education without pushing any agendas.

  • Sally Freeman Lab Derby North

    Question

    The MP inquired about how schools will be supported in implementing new guidelines, especially with respect to sexual harassment content.

    Minister reply

    The minister confirmed that the guidance includes specific advice for teachers on handling issues like online influencers and abusive behaviour. She did not detail additional support but noted that existing resources should suffice.

  • Catherine McKinnell Lab Newcastle upon Tyne North

    Question

    Expressed concerns about consultation with school leaders and the need for age-appropriate education, urgent responses from teachers, family diversity inclusion in RSHE, mental health support teams, parental access to information, and children's exposure to inappropriate online content.

    Minister reply

    Addressed concerns by emphasising clarity, teacher discretion for individual questions, factual teaching on gender reassignment, and progress made in mental health support within schools. Noted the availability of Oak materials in autumn.

  • Peter Bottomley Con Bognor Regis and Littlehampton

    Question

    Complimented the Secretary's proposals and expressed concern about inappropriate education material being disseminated by some organisations.

    Minister reply

    Acknowledged the infiltration of inappropriate materials and highlighted the importance of teaching biological sex, contrasting with Labour-run Wales' approach.

  • Lilian Greenwood Lab Nottingham South

    Question

    Asked how schools will manage pupil reactions to online pornography exposure.

    Minister reply

    Emphasised dealing with children's access to porn through other measures, highlighting parental role as primary educators and teacher discretion for individual concerns.

  • Julian Lewis Con New Forest East

    Question

    In answer to a question on 29 April, the Minister for Schools strongly endorsed the importance of sections 406 and 407 of the Education Act 1996. However, he is concerned that recent guidance may undermine these provisions which ban partisan political views in schools.

    Minister reply

    Political impartiality is important. The guidance aims to cover commonsense exceptions such as not giving a platform to those who argue against democracy or racism. The guidance will be reviewed to ensure clarity.

  • Jim McMahon Lab Co-op Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton

    Question

    Does the Secretary of State share his concern that not enough is being done on child safeguarding regarding child sexual exploitation? He notes that 43% of year 3 children have access to smartphones and stresses the importance of teaching these issues in schools.

    Minister reply

    The guidance 'Keeping children safe in education' addresses these concerns. There are ongoing discussions about limiting children's access to harmful content through mobile phones at a young age, and steps have been taken to ban smartphone use in schools.

  • John Hayes Con South Holland and The Deepings

    Question

    The MP warmly welcomes the Government’s approach but asks if the Secretary of State will look again at third-party organisations that are often invited into schools, sometimes carelessly. He asserts these steal children's innocence.

    Minister reply

    Transparency is important. Parents and Ofsted will now be able to review materials in schools against the issued guidance.

  • Question

    The MP questions if it is time for teachers to have sensible conversations with young people regarding sensitive topics. He urges colleagues to create common ground rather than dividing lines.

    Minister reply

    Times have moved on, and the guidance aims to provide clarity requested by parents and teachers to ensure respectful discussions of these issues.

  • Question

    The MP welcomes the guidance but raises three issues: removal of literature within schools, enforcement of the guidance, and a public inquiry into how children were put on a damaging health path.

    Minister reply

    Materials will now have to be shown to parents, no ifs or buts. Enforcement includes Ofsted’s usual processes which look at what is being taught in schools against the guidance.

  • Question

    The MP welcomes the statement and asks for an explanation of how many children have been exposed to unscientific gender ideology, steps to correct mistakes made, and assurance that nothing like this can ever happen again.

    Minister reply

    She takes responsibility for England. Gender questioning guidance was issued in December last year, and she is willing to work with Wales and Scotland if they want to address the issue.

  • Question

    Welcomes the guidance and asks about enforcement mechanisms when schools repeatedly breach it, as well as transparency for parents to know what their children are being taught.

    Minister reply

    Responds that Ofsted will use this guidance during inspections. Also mentions putting more communication on the education hub so parents can find out their rights.

  • Tonia Antoniazzi Lab Gower

    Question

    Concerned about teachers not being trained to deliver RSE, and notes the influence of lobby groups in England and Wales. Asks if the minister will share expert panel’s findings with the new Education Minister in Wales.

    Minister reply

    Agrees to a meeting with the Welsh Education Minister. Acknowledges poor-quality materials that have been used before and commits to producing quality materials through Oak National Academy.

  • Desmond Swayne Con New Forest West

    Question

    Asks if the remedy should be statutory requirement or guidance.

    Minister reply

    States it is statutory guidance, transparently available to parents and enforced by Ofsted. Supports teachers and headteachers in ensuring the correct implementation.

  • Munira Wilson Lib Dem Twickenham

    Question

    Cites evidence of inadequate RSE education leading to high rates of STIs among young people, and asks how new guidance will address this issue.

    Minister reply

    Commits to addressing the concerns raised through materials produced by Oak National Academy and cooperation with the Children’s Commissioner.

  • Justin Madders Lab Ellesmere Port and Bromborough

    Question

    Welcomes focus on tackling misogyny but asks about providing positive male role models for young boys.

    Minister reply

    Confirms that positive male role models will be celebrated and supported to counter misogynistic online influencers.

  • Jim Shannon DUP Strangford

    Question

    Compliments the Secretary of State on her wisdom in issuing guidance, and asks for protection of children’s innocence across all regions of the UK.

    Minister reply

    Acknowledges the need to balance letting kids be kids with equipping them for a complex world. Confirms commitment to protecting the innocence of children.

Shadow Comment

Catherine McKinnell

The Shadow Minister highlighted the importance of relationships, sex, and health education in preparing children for their world and future. She welcomed the guidance but expressed concerns over lack of consultation with school leaders. Her concerns included addressing urgent issues outside proposed age limits, especially regarding young victims of sexual abuse, and teaching about diverse family structures including transgender individuals. Catherine McKinnell also emphasised the need for mental health support in schools and praised local initiatives like Redbridge Council's Step In programme to tackle misogyny.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy