Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Disposal of Waste (Advertising and Penalty Provision)

26 March 2024 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Paul Bristow Con Peterborough

Environment

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Paul Bristow raised concerns about disposal of waste (advertising and penalty provision) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Mr Bristow argues for a zero-tolerance approach to fly-tipping, citing over one million incidences annually
  • The Bill seeks to require valid waste transfer licences in advertisements
  • Local authorities are to issue fixed penalty notices under Section 34 of the Environment Act 1990

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Paul Bristow Con Peterborough

Mr Bristow argues for a zero-tolerance approach to fly-tipping, highlighting over one million incidences annually. He emphasises the environmental and health risks posed by illegal waste disposal, including contamination of air, water, and soil. The Bill aims to require valid waste transfer licences in advertisements and mandate local authorities to issue fixed penalty notices under Section 34 of the Environment Act 1990.

Other contributors (1)
  • Paul Bristow Con Peterborough

    He calls for raising awareness, educating communities on consequences, enforcing existing laws with severe penalties, and ensuring regulated waste disposal services. He also highlights the Government’s statistic that 68% of advertised waste removals are by unregistered companies trading illegally.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy