Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Devolution (Employment) (Scotland)

17 October 2023 · 1 other contributor

Opened by David Linden SNP Aberdeen South

EmploymentScotland

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

David Linden raised concerns about devolution (employment) (scotland) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • The motion aims to amend the Scotland Act 1998 to grant the Scottish Parliament legislative competence for employment matters.
  • David Linden criticises the UK government for declining progress on workers' rights and mentions specific issues like fire and rehire practices and maternity discrimination.
  • Major trade unions support the devolution of employment law to the Scottish Parliament.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

David Linden SNP Aberdeen South

The motion seeks to amend the Scotland Act 1998 to grant legislative competence for employment matters to the Scottish Parliament. David Linden criticises the lack of progress on workers' rights and mentions numerous issues such as fire and rehire practices, maternity discrimination, and trade union attacks by the Conservative government. He highlights that the UK's global rating on workers’ rights has fallen and supports devolving employment law due to backing from major trade unions.

Other contributors (1)
  • David Linden SNP Aberdeen South

    David Linden expresses concern over the decline in workers' rights under the current British Government. He cites examples of workplace injustices and supports the devolution of employment law to Scotland, which is backed by significant trade unions.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy