House of Commons · Bill Debate
18 September 2023 · 2 other contributors
Opened by Christopher Chope Con Christchurch
Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.
Christopher Chope raised concerns about no formal bill name, but related to the process of setting precedence for private members’ bills on friday 20 october 2023 - manuscript amendment deleting paragraphs (2) and (3) of the motion proposed by penny mordaunt in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
Key points
Key requests to Government
Amendment agreed to.
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.
Opened the debate
Proposes to delete paragraphs (2) and (3) of the original motion. Argues that this amendment would ensure established practice and precedent continue, preventing a novel process from being introduced for private Members’ Bills on Friday 20 October. He supports maintaining the long-standing rule of practice that prevents moving a Bill set down for a specific day to an earlier date without proper precedence.
Questions the necessity of another sitting Friday for private Members’ Bills. She expresses concern that there has been a lack of significant Government business proposed, and suggests using remaining sitting days to consider these bills instead of adding an extra day.
Supports the introduction of an additional private Member’s Bill Friday. She argues it is important for concluding cross-party supported business, particularly in areas like workers’ protections.
Government Response
Agrees to accept Christopher Chope's manuscript amendment to delete paragraphs (2) and (3). Acknowledges the importance of private Members’ Bills and expresses support for cross-party efforts. Reassures that Government is working on legislative progress across various issues including border security, public services, and transport.