Opened the debate
Asked for advice on how to secure a substantive response from the Department for Transport regarding the A31 corridor scheme funding arrangements, highlighting concerns over delays in communication and the impact on constituents.
House of Commons · General Debate
Points of Order
15 July 2026 · 2 other contributors
Opened by Gregory Stafford Con Constituency
Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.
At a glance
Gregory Stafford raised concerns about points of order in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
Key points
- Concerns raised about delays in communication from the Department for Transport regarding the A31 corridor scheme funding arrangements
- Asked for advice on how to secure a substantive response from the Department for Transport
- No commitments made by the government during the debate
How the debate unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.
Other contributors (2)
-
Responded to Gregory Stafford's point of order by emphasising the importance of timely Ministerial responses and suggesting he raise his concerns with the Leader of the House at business questions. She also responded to Freddie Van Mierlo's concern about a perceived misleading statement from the Minister for Digital Government and Data, advising on avenues for further questioning or seeking clarification.
-
Asked for advice regarding whether a Minister had given an incomplete answer about funding cuts to the Science and Technology Facilities Council, which has led to confusion among constituents. He sought guidance on ensuring clear communication from Ministers.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy