House of Commons · Bill Debate
22 March 2023 · 4 other contributors
Opened by Andrew Griffith Con Arundel and South Downs
Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.
Andrew Griffith raised concerns about uk infrastructure bank bill - lords amendment 3b in lieu of commons amendment 3 in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
Key points
Key requests to Government
Lords amendment 3B agreed to
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.
Opened the debate
The lead MP moved the Lords amendment 3B, which explicitly includes nature-based solutions within the UK Infrastructure Bank’s remit. He acknowledged previous debate points and noted that while nature-based solutions were already included in the broad definition of infrastructure, adding them explicitly reflects public sentiment across both Houses. The amendment aims to balance clarity with flexibility for the bank's operations.
Proposes Lords amendment 3B, supporting inclusion of nature-based solutions within the Bill’s remit to ensure clear objectives for tackling climate change. Acknowledges support from all sides and the importance of the Infrastructure Bank in economic growth.
Supports the Bill but raises concerns about removing circular economy structures from objectives. Argues this omission is somewhat perverse despite acknowledging Lords amendment 3B as an improvement over original Government amendment.
Agrees with SNP spokesperson’s concerns about excluding circular economy structures, emphasising the importance of foundational aspects of infrastructure in future investments. Calls for explicit inclusion to ensure clarity and anticipation of support.
On behalf of Opposition, supports the amendment as it improves the Bill text. Acknowledges the importance of inclusivity in infrastructure projects.