Commons Sense

House of Commons · Bill Debate

Procurement Bill - Clause 2 (Further provision about power)

22 March 2023 · 4 other contributors

Opened by Nigel Huddleston Con Droitwich and Evesham

BrexitBusiness Compliance

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Nigel Huddleston raised concerns about procurement bill - clause 2 (further provision about power) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • The Government amendment in the Procurement Bill rectifies a minor typographical error in clause 2(1)(a).
  • The amendment inserts the word 'different' to allow regulations to make different provisions for different purposes or areas.
  • This flexibility is similar to provisions in the Trade Act 2021 for trade agreement regulations.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Nigel Huddleston Con Droitwich and Evesham

This Government amendment rectifies a minor typographical error in clause 2(1)(a), clarifying the power available to Ministers or devolved authorities under clause 1. The amendment inserts the word 'different' to allow regulations to make different provisions for different purposes or areas, retaining flexibility should it be needed in future scenarios such as implementing amendments differently for utilities and local government sectors. This flexibility is also reflected in trade agreement regulations under the Trade Act 2021.

Other contributors (4)
  • Gareth Thomas Lab Co-op Harrow West

    The amendment, though seemingly innocuous, is a missed opportunity to address concerns raised by the Opposition and experts about recent trade deals. The Australian deal, for instance, has been criticised for inadequate protections for British businesses in the Australian procurement market and exaggerated benefits. This amendment increases Ministers' power without addressing these issues or improving parliamentary scrutiny of regulations implementing procurement chapters from trade deals.

  • Anthony Mangnall Con Totnes

    Supports the bill, emphasising the value of trade opportunities brought by agreements with Australia and New Zealand. Argues that trade deals grow over time and benefits can be realised through procurement regulations.

  • Richard Thomson SNP Gordon

    Opposes the amendment, arguing it is a poor deal for Scotland based on UK Government analysis showing minimal economic benefit over 15 years compared to EU trade deals. Believes nothing in the amendment changes his view of the deal.

  • Nigel Huddleston Con Droitwich and Evesham

    Supports the bill, citing benefits for UK businesses and job creation. Criticises opposition members for not supporting trade deals.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy