Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Planning (Quarries)

14 March 2023 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Paul Holmes Con Hamble Valley

Environment

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Paul Holmes raised concerns about planning (quarries) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Mr Holmes proposed a Bill to introduce a presumption against approving quarry development near settlements.
  • The Bill requires environmental and health risk assessments for such developments.
  • Concerns were raised about Cemex's planning application for a quarry in Hamble Valley, citing inadequate consultation and overburdened infrastructure.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Paul Holmes Con Hamble Valley

Mr. Holmes proposed the Bill to introduce a presumption against approving quarry development near settlements, requiring environmental and health risk assessments for such developments, and transferring decision-making power from local authorities to the Secretary of State. He highlighted concerns about Cemex's planning application for a quarry in Hamble Valley, noting inadequate consultation, overburdened infrastructure, and potential health risks including air pollution.

Other contributors (1)
  • Nigel Evans Con Kelvedon

    Mr. Evans noted that there was no opposition to the motion for the Bill and proceeded with the formalities of presenting the Bill.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy