Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Bill presented

09 February 2023 · 2 other contributors

Opened by Marcus Fysh Con Yeovil

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Marcus Fysh raised concerns about bill presented in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Mr Fysh raised a point of order regarding the inability to register an interest in the parliamentary contributory pension fund's investment in renewable energy.
  • The investment in renewable energy by the fund now amounts to at least 10%.
  • Mr Fysh argued that public perception might view such investments as potentially influencing MPs' actions or words due to significant Government-mandated transition and subsidy for renewables.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Marcus Fysh Con Yeovil

Mr Fysh raised a point of order regarding his inability to register an interest in the large-scale change of policy by the parliamentary contributory pension fund, which is now investing in renewable energy amounting to at least 10% of the fund. He argued that due to significant Government-mandated transition and subsidy for renewables, it should be obvious that members of the public might reasonably think such investment may influence MPs' actions or words.

Other contributors (2)
  • Marcus Fysh Con Yeovil

    Mr Fysh has been attempting since May last year to register his interest in the large-scale change of policy by the parliamentary contributory pension fund, which is now investing in renewable energy amounting to no less than 10% of the fund. The registrar and Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards have not allowed him to register an interest citing a provision of the rules that states the pension scheme does not need to be registered as it is available to all Members.

  • Rosie Winterton Lab Stockport

    Ms Winterton thanked Mr Fysh for his point of order and noted that the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards is independent, making it difficult for the Chair to comment directly. She suggested that the Committee on Standards might take note of the issue and ensure that if there is anything further needed from Mr Fysh, they will come back to him.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy