Commons Sense

House of Commons · Bill Debate

Animal Welfare (Penalty Notices) Bill - Clause 1: Introduction of penalty notices for animal welfare offences

29 October 2021 · 17 other contributors

Opened by Andrew Rosindell Reform Romford

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Andrew Rosindell raised concerns about animal welfare (penalty notices) bill - clause 1: introduction of penalty notices for animal welfare offences in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Proposing the Animal Welfare (Penalty Notices) Bill to introduce financial penalties for animal welfare offences.
  • The penalties would range up to 5,000 and serve as an intermediary measure between warnings and criminal prosecution.
  • Aims to improve public health, animal welfare, and protection of national herds and flocks.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Andrew Rosindell Reform Romford

As chairman of the all-party parliamentary group on zoos and aquariums, I am proposing this Bill to introduce a system of penalty notices for animal welfare offences. This would sit between warning letters and criminal prosecution, providing a fairer and more effective alternative to the current EU cross-compliance scheme. The aim is to improve behaviour through proportionate financial penalties of up to £5,000, enhancing public health, animal welfare, and national herds/flocks protection.

Other contributors (17)
  • Andrew Rosindell Con Romford

    The Bill proposes a penalty notice system to address less severe transgressions in animal welfare, such as inaccurately recording livestock movements or missing licence numbers on pet advertisements. This would provide a middle ground between warning and criminal prosecution, encouraging compliance with animal health regulations without unduly penalizing the farming community.

  • Darren Henry Lab Broxtowe

    Supports the Bill, highlighting its importance in standing up for animal rights and ensuring those who mistreat animals are held accountable. Emphasises that the legislation is crucial to closing gaps in existing law and provides necessary legal protections.

  • Ruth Edwards Con Rushcliffe

    Congratulates the hon. Member for Romford on his work, shares personal anecdotes about pets, and praises government initiatives such as the Animal Welfare (Sentencing) Act 2021 and the Animal Welfare (Kept Animals) Bill. Emphasises the need for tougher penalties to prevent animal cruelty.

  • Sara Britcliffe Lab Hyndburn

    Welcomes the Bill, citing personal experiences with pet mistreatment and theft. Emphasises that pets are more than just animals but companions, expressing hope that the legislation will help cover cases of unidentified animal cruelty.

  • Aaron Bell Con Wells

    Supports the Bill and praises its drafter for addressing a gap in current legislation. Highlights the importance of reporting mechanisms to monitor the effects of the Bill post-enactment.

  • Ben Everitt Con Milton Keynes North

    Supports the Bill as it reduces unfair penalisation of farmers and strikes a sensible balance between caution and full legal force for prosecutors. Acknowledges the importance of animal welfare issues highlighted by Cats Protection, citing statistics from RSPCA investigations in 2019, which recorded over 130,000 complaints of cruelty against animals with more than 1,678 convictions.

  • Ben Spencer Con Runnymede and Weybridge

    Praises the Bill for its importance in a suite of animal welfare protections. Emphasises the need for a range of enforcement measures rather than a binary approach, and highlights the work of Cats Protection and Battersea Dogs and Cats Home in supporting animal welfare.

  • Daniel Zeichner Lab Cambridge

    While appreciating the hon. Member's intentions and reassurances from the Minister, Daniel expressed concerns over the clarity of the Bill, especially regarding its drafting and potential downgrading of serious offences to minor penalties. He sought assurances that it would only address low-level breaches and welcomed the support of animal welfare organisations like RSPCA and Battersea Dogs and Cats Home.

  • Duncan Baker Con North Norfolk

    Proudly supporting the Bill, Duncan highlighted its importance in addressing animal cruelty complaints and its role as a bridging measure between custodial sentences and minor crimes. He also commended efforts against pet theft and expressed his constituency's strong support for animal welfare.

  • Peter Gibson Con Darlington

    Commending the Bill, Peter emphasised its importance in strengthening penalties for animal abuse and its endorsement by the RSPCA. He highlighted personal anecdotes about his pet dogs to underline the human-animal bond.

  • Dehenna Davison Con Bishop Auckland

    Supports the Bill, highlighting its importance in addressing animal cruelty. Emphasises that pets are valued members of households and shares an anecdote about her rescue puppy Carter to illustrate the emotional impact of pet ownership.

  • Richard Holden Con Basildon and Billericay

    Pays tribute to Sir David Amess for his contributions on animal welfare issues. Supports the Bill, mentioning its alignment with other animal welfare legislation. Acknowledges the work of Farplace Animal Rescue and Westway Vets in pushing for measures against pet theft.

  • Tom Randall Lab Mayor of London

    Congratulates Andrew Rosindell on introducing the Bill, highlighting its continuation of the Government's good record on animal welfare. Supports the introduction of fines for animal cruelty and acknowledges the enforcement gap that the Bill aims to address.

  • Jo Churchill Con Bosworth

    The Minister supports the Bill for its role in encouraging compliance with animal welfare rules through penalty notices. She highlighted contributions from other Members and praised Sir David Amess's dedication to animal welfare, expressing a desire to build on his work. The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs aims to elevate the UK’s reputation for animal health and welfare by introducing measures like the fully funded vet visit programme.

  • Ben Everitt Con North Cornwall

    Inquired about opportunities for the UK to lead globally in improving animal welfare standards, acknowledging the country's position as a world leader in this area. Suggested collaboration could identify appropriate tools and guidance.

  • Nigel Evans Con Islwyn

    Honoured Sir David Amess’s spirit during the debate, noting his absence but believing he would support the legislation. Emphasised cross-party agreement on animal welfare standards.

  • Andrew Rosindell Con Romford

    Acknowledged the support from Members and expressed hope for cross-party collaboration to enhance animal welfare standards, bridging gaps in enforcement through penalty notices. Reassured that the Bill can be improved in Committee.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy