Commons Sense

House of Commons · Adjournment Debate

Sentencing Regime for 17-year-olds

05 July 2021 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Tom Hunt Lab Ipswich

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Tom Hunt raised concerns about sentencing regime for 17-year-olds in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • Tom Hunt raised concerns about the sentencing regime for 17-year-olds in the UK Parliament.
  • Chris Philp acknowledged the tragic death of Richard Day and discussed current judicial options for sentencing young offenders.
  • Philp mentioned recent legislative changes to increase prison sentences for serious crimes committed by under-18s.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Tom Hunt Lab Ipswich

Tom Hunt, Member of Parliament for Ipswich, detailed a tragic incident where Richard Day was murdered by Andrea Cristea. He emphasised the impact on Day's family and the community, highlighting concerns over justice and public safety. Hunt called for reform in the criminal justice system, particularly regarding sentences handed down to young offenders who commit violent crimes like manslaughter.

Other contributors (1)
  • Agreed with Tom Hunt's call for further reforms.

Government Response

Chris Philp thanked Tom Hunt for raising the issue and acknowledged the tragic nature of Richard Day's death. He detailed current judicial options available to judges in sentencing young offenders, highlighting recent legislative changes that will increase prison sentences for serious crimes committed by under-18s. Philp also addressed specific concerns raised by Hunt, such as the possibility of deportation for non-British nationals convicted and the consideration of a sliding scale for manslaughter sentences similar to murder.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy