Commons Sense

House of Commons · Bill Debate

Forensic Science Regulator (Amendment) Bill - Unspecified, debate on Third Reading of the entire bill

12 March 2021 · 4 other contributors

Opened by Darren Jones Lab Bristol North West

Justice & Courts

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Darren Jones raised concerns about forensic science regulator (amendment) bill - unspecified, debate on third reading of the entire bill in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • The hon. Member for Bristol North West introduced the Forensic Science Regulator (Amendment) Bill to put the Forensic Science Regulator on a statutory footing.
  • The Bill aims to enhance integrity in criminal justice by ensuring quality and trustworthiness of forensic science services.
  • The Bill was read the Third time and passed.

Key requests to Government

Bill accordingly read the Third time and passed.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Darren Jones Lab Bristol North West

The hon. Member for Bristol North West introduced and has been instrumental in progressing this Bill to its current form, which aims to put the Forensic Science Regulator on a statutory footing, enabling enforcement action if standards are not met. He appreciates the constructive attitude of all those involved, including his predecessor's introduction of the bill previously, and the support from both Houses. The Bill is seen as enhancing integrity in criminal justice by ensuring quality and trustworthiness of forensic science services.

Other contributors (4)
  • Kit Malthouse Con North West Hampshire

    He commends the hon. Member for Bristol North West for his constructive approach, noting the Bill's importance in improving forensic standards across the UK and its positive impact on trustworthiness of evidence in court. He acknowledges reduction in cost estimates to £220,000 annually from an earlier estimate of £400,000 due to robust analysis.

  • Bambos Charalambous Lab Southgate and Wood Green

    Supports the Bill for putting the Forensic Science Regulator on a statutory footing, allowing enforcement actions if standards are not met. He notes it aligns with the Government’s 2016 forensic science strategy and enhances integrity of criminal justice.

  • Christopher Chope Con Christchurch

    Supports the Bill as a means to ensure absolute trust in the quality and integrity of forensic services, crucial for evidence provided in court. Acknowledges scrutiny on cost estimates leading to revised figures.

  • Darren Jones Lab Bristol North West

    Reiterates gratitude towards all those involved and the progress made. He looks forward to the Bill passing smoothly through the House of Lords, enhancing trustworthiness in forensic services.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy