Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Apologies

01 December 2020 · 2 other contributors

Opened by John Howell Con Henley

NHS

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

John Howell raised concerns about apologies in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Speaker argues for a Bill allowing apologies without legal liability
  • Bill aims to enhance dispute resolution through meaningful apologies
  • Examples cited include NHS clinical negligence and US states with similar laws

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

John Howell Con Henley

The speaker argues for a Bill that allows an apology to be given without creating legal liability, aiming to introduce civility and common sense into society. He highlights the lack of rights taken away but the enhancement of dispute resolution through meaningful apologies, using examples from NHS clinical negligence and US states with similar legislation. The initiative aims to encourage more amicable resolutions by incentivising parties to make sincere apologies.

Other contributors (2)
  • John Howell Con Henley

    Proposes a Bill that would allow an apology to be given without creating legal liability, aiming to introduce civility and common sense into society. It does not take away any rights but introduces an element of dispute resolution through meaningful apologies, using examples from NHS clinical negligence and US states with similar legislation.

  • Lindsay Hoyle Lab Chorley

    As the Speaker, he acknowledged the debate by quipping about no need for apologies in a light-hearted manner. He then moved to order the presentation of the Bill and its scheduling for second reading.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy