Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Planning (Proper Maintenance of Land)

22 September 2020 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Jonathan Gullis Lab Stoke-on-Trent North

Environment

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Jonathan Gullis raised concerns about planning (proper maintenance of land) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Concerns raised about inadequate penalties for neglecting historic buildings
  • Moves proposed to increase fines for destroying historic structures
  • Current penalties are deemed insufficient to deter irresponsible ownership

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Jonathan Gullis Lab Stoke-on-Trent North

Moves for increased fines to punish those who seek to destroy historic buildings, citing the case of Price and Kensington in his constituency. He argues that current penalties are inadequate and do not deter irresponsible owners from neglecting heritage assets, resulting in significant costs for local authorities and taxpayers.

Other contributors (1)
  • Jonathan Gullis Lab Stoke-on-Trent North

    Proposes a Bill to increase fines for non-compliance with section 215 notices. Cites the example of Price and Kensington, a grade II* listed building in serious disrepair due to negligent ownership. He emphasises that current penalties are insufficient deterrents, as evidenced by cases where owners receive minor fines while taxpayers bear substantial costs for repairs.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy