Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Tree-lined Streets

15 July 2020 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Chris Clarkson Lab Heywood and Middleton

ClimateEnvironment

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Chris Clarkson raised concerns about tree-lined streets in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Mr Clarkson argued for the importance of trees in urban environments, citing their benefits for physical and mental health and cleaner air.
  • He referenced a study linking higher street tree density to better perceived health and fewer cardiometabolic conditions among residents.
  • The Bill aims to contribute to the Government's target of eradicating net carbon emissions by 2050 and supports tree planting across towns and cities in England.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Chris Clarkson Lab Heywood and Middleton

Mr Clarkson argued for the importance of trees in urban environments, emphasising their role in enhancing physical and mental health, supporting nature's recovery, addressing climate change, and contributing to cleaner air. He cited a study showing that higher street tree density correlates with better perceived health and fewer cardiometabolic conditions among residents. The Bill would also contribute to the Government’s target of eradicating net carbon emissions by 2050 and support the planting of trees across towns and cities in England.

Other contributors (1)
  • Chris Clarkson Lab Heywood and Middleton

    Mr Clarkson highlighted the need for developers to recognise the benefits of trees, including cleaner air, increased physical exercise, enhanced health and wellbeing. He also acknowledged the importance of street trees in supporting environmental health and aesthetics in new developments.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy