Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Social Security

10 February 2020 · 13 other contributors

Opened by Will Quince Con Nottingham North

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Will Quince raised concerns about social security in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • The draft Social Security Benefits Up-rating Order 2020 will increase the basic state pension by 3.9% and other benefits by 1.7%.
  • The order will result in an additional 5 billion expenditure in 2020-21.
  • The Minister highlighted increases in various benefits including working-age benefits and disability-related needs.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Will Quince Con Nottingham North

The draft Social Security Benefits Up-rating Order 2020 will increase the basic state pension by 3.9%, new state pension in line with the triple lock, and other benefits such as state earnings-related pensions, protected payments in the new state pension, working age benefits, carers benefits, and disability-related needs by 1.7% in line with prices. The order proposes to spend an extra £5 billion in 2020-21 on increasing benefit and pension rates.

Other contributors (13)
  • Mike Amesbury Lab West Derbyshire

    The working-age benefits freeze, which has been in place since 2016, has led to a cut in the real level of benefits by 6%. This has resulted in child poverty and homelessness at alarming levels. Families living in poverty are now a total of £560 worse off annually due to the four-year freeze. The increase proposed is insufficient given the previous cuts.

  • Debbie Abrahams Lab Oldham East and Saddleworth

    The reduction in social security benefits has led to an increase in child poverty, as concluded by charities such as the Joseph Rowntree Foundation. The impact of harsh policies like the two-child limit and the five-week wait has forced many families to turn to food banks.

  • Kate Green Lab Stretford and Urmston

    The working-age benefits freeze has widened the discrepancy between pensioners' protection through the triple lock and those on working-age benefits. These cuts have been self-defeating, as research shows that restoring local housing allowance rates would save billions in long-term costs.

  • Anneliese Dodds Lab Co-op Oxford East

    The cuts to social security are politically motivated and have led to increased poverty and hardship. Restoring local housing allowance rates would help alleviate some of the financial strain on families in private rented accommodation.

  • Steven Baker Con Wycombe

    Asked for Labour's position on benefit increases, noting that the Government has proposed an overall cost but did not receive a direct response regarding Labour's plans for increases and costs to taxpayers.

  • Chris Stephens SNP Glasgow North West

    The Conservative Government's attempts to address the mess caused by austerity measures are inadequate. The four-year benefit freeze, along with subsequent cuts, have led to a significant decline in working-age benefits and tax credits. Affected benefits will be around 6% lower in 2020-21 than they would have been under CPI indexation since 2010. Child poverty rates have soared, with 250,000 children living in poverty in Scotland alone. Poverty is a result of political choices made by the Government over the last decade.

  • Debbie Abrahams Lab Oldham East and Saddleworth

    Asked Chris Stephens about Citizens Advice's proposal to uprate frozen benefits not just by CPI but by CPI plus 2% for four years. This would address the imbalance caused by the benefit freeze.

  • Chris Stephens SNP Glasgow North West

    Acknowledged Debbie Abrahams' suggestion regarding the Citizens Advice proposal and expressed hope that the Government will consider it. Discussed the housing crisis, particularly in England, noting a 60% rise in households living in temporary accommodation between 2012 and 2018 and nearly doubling of rough sleepers over five years.

  • Stephen Timms Lab East Ham

    Welcomed the end to the benefits freeze but noted that seven years without inflation uprating have caused significant issues. Jobseeker’s allowance for a single adult will be £74.35 per week, which is one sixth less than it would be if RPI had been used since 2010. Child benefit similarly suffers from underfunding. Citizens Advice research shows that the proportion of people with no money left after covering living costs increased from 32% in 2016 to 38% by 2019 due to the freeze.

  • Debbie Abrahams Lab Oldham East and Saddleworth

    Pressed Stephen Timms about his concern regarding the Government's proposed increase in benefits, questioning whether it will sufficiently rectify the social security situation.

  • Stephen Timms Lab East Ham

    Agreed with Debbie Abrahams, expressing concern that while the situation won't worsen significantly, the damage caused by austerity measures over a decade cannot be adequately addressed by current proposals.

  • Kate Green unknown constituency

    Critiques the household benefit cap for its lack of consideration towards diverse family structures and needs.

  • Stephen Timms Lab East Ham

    Questions the Minister about the adequacy of benefits under inflation, the rationale behind benefit reductions, and the future definition of RPI. He highlights the issue with local housing allowance not keeping up with rental costs, leading to homelessness and severe living conditions for families on benefits.

Government Response

Acknowledges contributions from Members and reiterates Government's commitment to support working individuals while protecting the vulnerable. Highlights increases in state pensions, pension credit standard minimum guarantee, working-age benefits, universal credit work allowances, and additional disability needs and carer benefits.

Shadow Response

Mike Amesbury

Labour intends to abstain from voting on the statutory instrument, considering it a token increase insufficient given the previous cuts and the entrenchment of poverty in society.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy