Global Britain

Suggested a preferential trading arrangement with Commonwealth allies as proposed by the former President of Nigeria, to build on existing bonds within Her Majesty’s realm.

Asked about the Government's plans to strengthen CANZUK (Canada, Australia, New Zealand and UK) relationships in trade and free movement. Emphasised the potential for a strong role.

Responded that when entering the EU, relationships with allies like Canada, New Zealand became less close. Now leaving the EU offers an opportunity to build better ties, naming Australia and New Zealand as priority trading partners.

Stressed that UK does not face a stark choice between maximising trade with either the European Union or the rest of the world. The UK can maximize trade with both through EU leadership, avoiding potential losses in opportunities.

Acknowledged the point and reiterated ambitions for securing pioneering free trade agreements with Japan, Australia and other key partners. Highlighted opportunities to expand trade through CPTPP involving 11 fast-growing Pacific economies.

Suggested extending free trade relationships with overseas territories, considering them as potential trading posts for Great Britain.

Agreed on the point and mentioned launching a GREAT ready-to-trade campaign showcasing modern UK. Emphasised trade's role in shaping the world, highlighting battles between protectionism and free trade.

Suggested allowing developing countries to have tariffs removed post-Brexit for cheaper products and expanding their economies through trade instead of aid.

Critiqued the current state of global trade rules, highlighting issues with multinational corporations and protectionist policies from countries like China and the USA. He emphasised the importance of an open and fair trading system that protects workplace rights and environmental standards.

Asked why leaving the EU would give a better opportunity to deal with issues highlighted by Labour MPs, suggesting a critical view of the effectiveness of EU policies in addressing such problems.

Expressed concerns about the future of UK steel industry post-Brexit and emphasised the need for a good trading partnership with the EU to protect its interests. She highlighted that 75% of her constituency’s steel exports go to the EU.

Reiterated concerns about global trade policies, the impact of dumping and protectionist tariffs on UK industries, and called for a coherent strategy from the Government. He urged the need for free trade agreements with zero tariffs/quota to protect existing trade.

Mr. Fysh questioned the Opposition's stance on trade policies, suggesting it was protectionist and similar to EU customs union policies.

In response, Mr. Gardiner defended his position, stating that Labour’s approach is about setting a new course for global Britain rather than rolling over previous exploitative treaties and agreements.

Calls for an update on arms sales breaches, bribery investigations involving British companies overseas, expresses concerns over Britain's role in global climate change and geopolitical implications of shifting towards renewable energy. Criticises UK Export Finance for financing fossil fuel projects and urges a shift to supporting renewable technologies instead.

Questions Labour’s vision for the role of the UK in international trade, highlighting opportunities for cooperation with continents like Africa and Asia. Criticises Gardiner's stance on defence and security exports, US relations, and Saudi Arabia.

Agreed with Steven Baker that the outcome of the general election endorsing the referendum result is a tribute to the British people.

Asked Steven Baker about working together as a House to ensure tariff reduction remains on the table for future deals, supporting liberalisation of tariffs and non-tariff barriers.

The hon. Member for Glasgow East emphasised the importance of acknowledging differing viewpoints, particularly in the context of Scotland's relationship with the UK post-Brexit referendum. He acknowledged that the Conservative party has a mandate to take England out of the EU but highlighted that this does not extend to Scotland due to regional differences and changing circumstances. Stewart McDonald urged the Government to engage more fully with the Scottish perspective on Brexit, expressing concern over the UK's handling of issues like freedom of movement and trade. He criticised the Government for rejecting compromise proposals from Scotland without consideration and emphasised the historical significance of the European Union in promoting peace and free exchange.

The hon. Member for Wycombe responded to Stewart McDonald, reiterating his acceptance of the Brexit referendum result as a mandate from the electorate. He acknowledged that while he respects others' right to advocate for independence in Scotland, he expects them to accept their own referendum results.

The hon. Member for North Down questioned whether the Government truly understands the complexity of economic integration and free trade within the EU context. He highlighted Northern Ireland's unique perspective in the Brexit debate, suggesting that the UK's 'Global Britain' branding does not adequately represent the situation in Northern Ireland.

The hon. Member for Wellingborough raised a point about the potential advantages of leaving the EU, specifically mentioning the possibility to lower tariffs for developing countries independently.

The speaker criticises the Government's stance on Huawei and questions the authenticity of 'global Britain'. He also inquires about the upcoming integrated defence and foreign policy review, asking if it will be a proper strategic defence and security review or fiscally neutral. Additionally, he raises concerns over the UK's China strategy, its response to the Trump Palestine-Israel plan, and asks for clarity on NATO inclusion and capability assessment. The speaker concludes by highlighting Scotland’s commitment to Europe despite the Conservative party giving up on EU membership.

Responded to Stuart Anderson's speech, focusing on how Britain is perceived internationally due to Brexit. Highlighted concerns about the UK's reputation being undermined and questioned the logic of leave campaigners who suggest economic damage is worth it for an illusion of freedom.

Asked what was illusory about having control over borders and international trade policy post-Brexit.

The Government’s mantra of ‘get Brexit done’ undermines the UK's negotiating power with the EU, US, and other countries. The process of leaving the EU will compromise standards, businesses, public services, and environmental protections established over 40 years. Labour demands parliamentary oversight to protect these values during future trade deals.

Welcomes the Secretary of State’s vision for global Britain post-Brexit and acknowledges the importance of national security in fostering economic prosperity. Emphasises the challenges posed by climate change, population growth in Africa, coastal migration risks, and the evolving nature of conflict into the digital domain.

Recognises the significance of the UK’s maritime sector, noting that 90% of trade goes by ship. Supports the potential benefits for shipping and free ports from leaving the EU.

Ellwood highlights the need for addressing an uneven playing field due to Chinese companies' ability to operate freely while Western counterparts cannot. He stresses the scale and financial power of Chinese entities like Alibaba and Huawei, urging a joint effort with Five Eyes nations to create their own 5G capabilities. Concerns over China's technological and military advancements are raised, advocating for a serious conversation about international rules. Finally, he calls for an honest review of UK defence needs and suggests increasing the defence budget.

Monaghan supports Ellwood's stance on Chinese companies acquiring UK firms involved in research due to insufficient Government funding. She highlights how the lack of domestic funding forces these companies to seek external support, often from China.

Ellwood acknowledges the duality in Chinese investments and contributions, noting positive developments like green technology alongside concerns such as coal investment. He expresses worries about military growth, citing substantial increases in China's space budget and military spending, underscoring the need for an adult conversation to establish new international rules.

Graham compliments Ellwood on his points regarding technology and the necessity of developing alternatives with Five Eyes partners. He provides a counterpoint by highlighting positive examples of Chinese investment, such as Geely's acquisition of London Taxi Company.

Ellwood appreciates Graham’s contribution and reiterates the need for an honest review of UK capabilities in light of changing world dynamics. He highlights outdated equipment and depleted naval resources, calling for a commitment to upgrade defence capabilities.

Lewis congratulates Ellwood on his new role as Chair of the Defence Committee and urges him to ensure that the combined defence review precedes the comprehensive spending round. He warns against a repetition of past issues where there was a fight between intelligence services and conventional forces over funding.

Ellwood thanks Lewis for his kind comments and reiterates the need for an unbiased review untethered by budget limitations. He expresses passion for defence, aiming to educate the public on UK's capabilities and aspirations in an uncertain world.

Thanked his family, friends and supporters for their support. Highlighted the large number of votes received in the election and pledged to work hard to repay the faith placed in him by voters. Paid tribute to his predecessor and mentioned his contributions to animal welfare. Emphasised Aberdeen's status as the best place to live and work in Scotland due to its natural assets, community groups, and economic opportunities. Criticised the Government for projecting Brexit as detrimental to Aberdeen and Scotland despite their strong ties with the EU. Condemned a decade of austerity leading to significant social issues such as increased food bank usage and women selling sex to support their families.

Shaun Bailey congratulates the Deputy Speaker and his predecessor, Adrian Bailey. He highlights the strong women in his life, including his mother who survived domestic abuse and inspired him to speak up for others. Shaun also discusses the three towns he represents: Wednesbury, Oldbury, and Tipton, each with rich industrial heritage and cultural significance. He emphasises the importance of economic opportunities and the need for global Britain to ensure that regions like his share equally in these opportunities. Unemployment is above average in his constituency, and he vows to fight for his constituents' rights and dignity.

I express gratitude to the people of Streatham for electing me as their Member of Parliament. I praise my constituency's history, activism, community spirit, and landmarks such as the longest high street in Europe. I acknowledge my predecessor Chuka Umunna who inspired my involvement in politics. I pay tribute to my mentor Diane Abbott and other parliamentarians like Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell for their principled stands against war, cuts, and racism. As a daughter of Ghanaian migrants, I am proud but concerned about rising racism and hate crimes. Debating global Britain, I argue the need to address historic injustices including slavery and colonialism before claiming global influence. I highlight the UK's historical debt to slave owners and its impact on immigrants like those in my constituency. Addressing knife crime and Grenfell Tower tragedy, I advocate for youth services investment and equality in justice administration. I oppose the Government’s stance on refugees and climate change, advocating instead for internationalism and environmental protection. My path to Parliament was unconventional and driven by activism against fascism.

Anderson welcomed speakers' contributions, particularly highlighting social justice issues. She expressed sadness about Britain's departure from the EU and emphasised the importance of defending multilateralism and core values like human rights, democracy, and environmental sustainability in a global context. Concerned about post-Brexit trade objectives and democratic deficits, Anderson highlighted issues such as child refugee rights and potential exposure to less environmentally friendly practices in US products. She advocated for fair trade policies that support economically vulnerable people and align with sustainable development goals.

Agrees with the importance of microfinance initiatives, such as Muhammad Yunus’s Grameen bank in Bangladesh, which supports women entrepreneurs. She calls for more engagement from the UK Government with these types of social enterprises.

Advocates for maintaining DFID as an independent department to avoid dilution of global clout and effectiveness in aid delivery. She also emphasises the need for increased environmental commitments, joint approaches to trade and climate change, and transparency in trade negotiations.

Expresses pride and relief over the UK's departure from the EU, highlighting the importance of reclaiming Britain’s role as a global trading nation. He emphasises strengthening ties with the Commonwealth, appreciating the contribution of overseas territories, and being outward-looking in global ambitions.

Agrees on prioritising free trade relations with the United States to maintain the special relationship between both countries.

Emphasises the importance of the Commonwealth and CANZUK countries for the UK's future, suggesting closer ties with Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. He mentions the Trans-Pacific Partnership trading arrangement and proposes a professional mobility visa to facilitate intra-company transfers and investment visas between these nations. Bristow also highlights the economic success of UK territories and dependencies and the importance of foreign direct investment for cities like Peterborough.

Clarke emphasises the importance of the UK's commitment to achieving the 2030 global goals through economic partnerships with Africa, Commonwealth countries and the World Trade Organisation. He highlights the success of the UK-Africa investment summit in London and the potential for British businesses to export to emerging markets in Africa. Clarke calls for a joint UK-Africa prosperity commission to develop pro-development trading arrangements and improve the investment climate and infrastructure for business trade in Africa.

Mangnall congratulates new Members to the House and pays tribute to Fleur Anderson for addressing global Britain on a humanitarian level. He expands further on his maiden speech, highlighting the virtues of an outward-looking Britain that does not shrink from its obligations in the world.

Hunt agrees with Clarke and emphasises the importance of supporting ports' rail and road infrastructure to facilitate their role in global trade. His contribution is brief but underscores the practical considerations for implementing economic partnerships.

Stressed the importance of an improved infrastructure network to decentralise capital from city centres into rural communities. Emphasised that global Britain is an outward-looking, sovereign nation focused on innovation and environmentalism. Highlighted his constituency's businesses contributing internationally, such as Brixham fish market using cloud technology for sales across Europe. Advocated for increased tax relief for research and development to enhance British products' international appeal. Noted the potential for foreign direct investment growth and encouraged expanding export figures beyond 'Buy British'. Mentioned maritime industry contributions and Erasmus scheme benefits. Referred to humanitarian efforts like the prevention of sexual violence in conflict initiative.

Expressed relief about leaving the European Union, approaching it with a sense of finality after three years of uncertainty. Acknowledged the contributions made by fellow Members during the debate.

Questions the relevance of Steve Double's nationalistic stance in the context of Scotland's diverse views on Brexit.

Defends his position by referencing the 2014 Scottish independence referendum and asserts that Scotland is part of the UK-wide decision to leave the EU.

Supports Steve Double's stance, emphasising the need for attention towards overseas territories like Gibraltar in future free trade agreements.

Agrees with Andrew Rosindell and argues that leaving the EU presents an opportunity to strengthen ties with UK’s overseas territories, enhancing their role in a global Britain.

Praises the importance of the United Nations as a critical component of Britain's foreign policy, reflecting on his personal experience serving as a UN officer.

Acknowledges Britain’s diminished status post-Suez but argues that due to its diverse and integrated assets, including language and military prowess, the UK remains a significant global power.

Mr. Stewart emphasises the importance of the UK's participation in the United Nations, highlighting that it is a founding member and holds a permanent seat on the Security Council. He discusses the current structure of the UN, including the power dynamics within the Security Council and the potential for future reforms. Mr. Stewart notes the UK's significant contributions to the UN budget for peacekeeping operations and supports increased efforts in UN peacemaking initiatives.

No extracted contribution text available for this contributor yet.

Mr. Graham speaks about the potential for Global Britain to become a reality, praising recent government initiatives such as the security and defence review and the Department for International Trade's expanded trade negotiation capabilities. He highlights the UK's strong domestic starting point, significant foreign direct investment in technology, and its growing diplomatic coverage worldwide.

Ms. Bardell raises concerns about resources available to the Foreign Office, particularly in terms of staffing levels and training for consular staff tasked with representing UK citizens abroad.

Mr. Seely points out issues related to pay and conditions within embassies, specifically the lack of line management over all embassy staff and inconsistent salaries for similar roles across different departments, suggesting these matters should be addressed in the upcoming foreign and defence review.

The speaker emphasised the importance of a unified presence for Her Majesty’s Government abroad, highlighting the ambassador or high commissioner as central figures. He stressed the UK's role in supporting an international rules-based order and its independence while working closely with allies on security issues. The speech advocated for proactive foreign policy decisions that align with British interests and values, such as trade agreements and defence partnerships. It also called for closer collaboration between government departments to support 'Global Britain', including attracting foreign technology investors and promoting British exports through initiatives like Global Britain exporting seminars.

Following up on Richard Graham's points, Bob Seely discussed the importance of developing alliances in line with a 'Global Britain' vision. He referenced his work on a study titled “Global Britain: A Twenty-First Century Vision” and mentioned the need to build partnerships with various countries including CANZUK nations and middle-ranking powers like Korea and Japan. Seely also pointed out the necessity for a strategic approach that combines hard and soft power, independent of previous ties to the US or EU.

Stewart highlighted the role of military academies in fostering international relations. He mentioned positive receptions when visiting abroad in uniform and advocated for using military education as a tool for soft influence, particularly with Middle Eastern countries.

McDonald raised concerns about China's operations within universities and the academic sector both in the UK and internationally, suggesting that these activities may require more political and governmental attention.

The hon. Member for Wellingborough suggests that based on his colleague’s remarks, Government policy regarding Huawei may be incorrect.

The hon. Member for Glasgow South agrees with his colleague from the Conservative Party and likens the situation to a digital Dunkirk, suggesting serious flaws in the Government's approach to managing risks posed by Huawei.

The hon. Member for Richmond Park proposes creating a democracy fund to use UK influence more effectively in supporting nations struggling with democratic governance, aligning with his role as chairman of the Westminster Foundation for Democracy.

Discussed the importance of his constituency's port in grain exports and container handling, noting that the port employs around 1,000 constituents. He also highlighted the economic significance of Felixstowe port which is Britain’s busiest container port and employs another 5,000 people.

Asked a question to his hon. Friend Tom Hunt about the potential value of free ports in helping them grow and become an international player in the maritime sector.

Mr Hunt expressed his support for the idea of Ipswich becoming a free port, highlighting the economic significance of Felixstowe and Ipswich ports to East Anglia. He cited that 48% of UK containerised trade passes through Felixstowe, contributing £80 billion annually to the economy. He argued that leaving the EU could enable more direct control over trade policies, allowing for quicker and more tailored agreements with various nations. Mr Hunt also pointed out that many proposed EU trade deals have stalled or failed, while independent countries like Chile have successfully negotiated free trade agreements covering a large portion of global GDP. Furthermore, he stressed the need for improved infrastructure to support increased trade activity in Ipswich and Felixstowe, including the resolution of issues with road and rail connectivity.

Celebrated the upcoming Brexit, noting its end of free movement, reduction in financial contributions to the EU, and reclaiming control over domestic laws. Proposed an additional bank holiday on the Friday nearest June 23rd each year as a permanent celebration of sovereignty.

Challenged Peter Bone's proposal for a new bank holiday, questioning his definition of 'establishment' and the relevance of following European countries’ practices while seeking to distance from them. Criticised Bone's proposal as an attempt to avoid work.

The Opposition welcome the opportunity to discuss Britain’s place in the world at this critical juncture for the future of our country. The Labour party wants to see Britain as a globally influential country, trading with partners as equals and fulfilling obligations to the poorest people in the world. However, they face significant challenges including a lack of trade negotiation expertise and an unclear Department structure responsible for negotiations. They demand clarity on how many fully trained trade negotiators we actually have, and emphasise the need for serious engagement with businesses and civil society about the potential benefits and costs of trade agreements. Additionally, there is concern over UK's ability to deliver 5G network without domestic tech capacity and the need for urgent action on Chinese steel dumping.

Asked if it is Labour’s policy to abide by WTO rules and whether she intends to build up the WTO, implying openness to free trade around the world.

Praised colleagues like Nic Dakin for their work in supporting the steel sector. Emphasised that there is a need for urgent action from the Government on prolonged dumping of Chinese steel.

Responded to the debate as the last Minister of the Crown while Britain remains in the EU. Acknowledged that Britain’s destiny lies outside the European Union, respecting differing views on Brexit. Stressed determination to involve every nation and region of the UK in the process of realising a global Britain agenda.

Asked for specific concessions made by the Government that were requested by the Scottish Government.

Asked for assurance that the UK's creative industries would be prioritised.

Noted the pioneering nature of the communications industry in the UK and its export potential, declaring an interest related to his spouse's communication company.

Called for another Minister of State to support trade negotiations due to their volume.

Mr Burns spoke about the opportunities that Brexit presents for Britain, dismissing the view that it is a disaster. He highlighted the opportunity to change visa situations and improve trade agreements. He mentioned that the government has managed to negotiate over £110 billion in trade continuity agreements. He also addressed speculation about the Prime Minister reshuffling his team or changing the structure of government, stating he had no information on this matter. Burns emphasised Britain's historical contributions and quoted Winston Churchill and Lady Thatcher to underscore the importance of earning back an independent trade policy. He concluded by expressing a desire for future generations to look back at their efforts with pride, seeing them as heralds of a new golden age.