Britain in the World

Asked how the Foreign Secretary will ensure sufficient parliamentary scrutiny during the review.

Stated that all mechanisms for scrutiny, including debates in the Chamber and Select Committee operations, would be used to ensure thorough review. Emphasised welcoming input from MPs and caucuses.

Suggested conducting a security and defence review independently of Treasury involvement and financial constraints.

Acknowledged the importance of clear strategy before reconciling means to ends, including financial considerations. Assured that cyber would not be pitted against troops as a zero-sum game.

Recalled the 2017-18 national security capability review being hampered by financial neutrality constraints, which played off parts of necessary defence and security against each other.

Agreed that a clear strategy was needed before reconciling means to ends, while also being mindful of financial parameters. Assured cyber would not be sidelined in favour of troops.

Asked the Foreign Secretary to ensure that his Department has the necessary resources to direct defence, development and intelligence services correctly.

Acknowledged the need for departmental capacity, welcomed support from colleagues on fighting for necessary resources with Treasury.

Urged to look carefully at the ability for human rights to be a forefront component in any financial review of Foreign Office, as it has been traditionally strong but less so now.

Agreed to work closely with Labour on values such as human rights. Assured the role of values in foreign policy and international rule of law would be strengthened.

The MP questioned whether the legislation in place was enough, stressing the need for actual implementation of policies towards a green industrial revolution.

Asked about the importance of spending 0.7% on international development and highlighted the necessity to ensure that every girl in the world gets 12 years of quality education, as mentioned in their manifesto.

Asked about the release of Raif Badawi, a jailed Saudi writer who was highlighted as an example to demonstrate the UK's commitment to human rights issues abroad.

Suggested that foreign policy should be made more democratically accountable and responsive to what voters think, especially in constituencies with diverse diaspora communities like his own.

Emphasised the importance of freedom of religion or belief for 80% of individuals around the world, highlighting the UK's strong track record in this area.

Asked about specific actions the Foreign Office would take in conflict zones such as Israel and the Middle East, Sri Lanka, and Cyprus to help end conflicts and bring perpetrators of war crimes to justice.

Highlighted the UK’s asset of population diversity that strengthens relationships with other countries, such as the Indian diaspora in the UK providing a living bridge between the UK and India.

Welcomes new Labour Front-Bench colleagues while expressing regret over departing members. Criticises the current Prime Minister for his past misjudgments on foreign policy issues, arguing that he lacks heart, brain, and courage in dealing with human rights, Donald Trump, jailed Britons, and tyrants overseas.

Asks Emily Thornberry to criticise the current Labour leader for antisemitism and his relationship with Hamas and other terrorist organisations involved in attacks on British citizens.

Critiques the Queen’s Speech for its lack of new initiatives in foreign policy, defence, or international development. Highlights issues such as the delay in publishing the Intelligence and Security Committee report on Russian interference with UK democracy, and questions the government's commitment to addressing global challenges like the Middle East plan, Yemen ceasefire resolution, Jamal Khashoggi murder investigation, and downgrading of sexual violence initiative.

Supports Thornberry's critique on foreign policy and highlights the importance of matching resource allocation with priorities such as addressing violence against women and girls in conflict zones, which appears to have been deprioritised by this Government.

Responds to Raab's intervention, challenging the government to explain why the budget for the prevention of sexual violence initiative has fallen from £15 million to £2 million and staffing levels have dropped drastically.

Denies Thornberry's claims about the downgrading of the prevention of sexual violence initiative, stating that it remains a key priority for the government. He mentions upcoming initiatives like an international conference in November and a global summit hosted by the UK.

Challenges Raab to provide specific figures on staffing reductions from 70 experts to 40, budget cut from £15 million to £2 million, and reduction in staff numbers including an intern. She questions the implications of these statistics.

Critiqued the government's budget allocation for international affairs, noting a significant decrease from £15 million in 2014 to £2 million with only four workers including an intern in 2020. Expressed concern over Iran and called for immediate action by the UN and EU to prevent escalation towards war.

Supported Brexit, emphasising that Britain should look beyond Europe for economic opportunities in countries like America, China, Brazil, India, and Indonesia. He argued against the gravity school of economics and supported trading with nations around the world rather than focusing only on nearby countries.

Questioned the concept of the gravity school of economics, agreeing with John Whittingdale that Britain has historically traded extensively with countries beyond Europe.

Challenged Whittingdale's argument by questioning the efficiency of trading outside Europe, citing issues with integrated supply chains where speed of delivery is critical. She argued that proximity still matters in modern global trade.

Supported Whittingdale's stance on the importance of negotiating both a good trade deal with the EU and US to increase export opportunities for UK businesses, emphasising that negotiation with the US will also help leverage negotiations with the EU.

My right hon. Friend suggests adding the Commonwealth to the list of organisations that will be increasingly important, emphasising free trade ties and practical help for Australia during its time of trouble.

Agrees with Redwood on the importance of the Commonwealth and suggests giving practical help to Australia. Emphasises the UK's soft power influence through English language, British Council, and BBC World Service. Supports media freedom and criticises human rights abuses against journalists in Iran and Malta.

Agrees with Whittingdale on the importance of supporting BBC Persian service journalists who are under pressure in Iran, highlighting media freedom concerns.

Emphasises the need for Britain to be seen positively by the world and calls for a quantum shift in complexity following Brexit. He highlights concerns about the implications of Brexit on foreign affairs, security cooperation, international development, and the potential merger between DFID and FCO.

Supports her colleague's stance regarding the protection of DFID's work and its budget. She emphasises the importance of maintaining aid programmes such as those focused on disability education.

Highlights the importance of adequate defence policy, emphasising flexibility in dealing with potential future threats. He criticises previous government decisions regarding funding for BBC Monitoring Service and advocates for a minimum defence expenditure level of 3% of GDP.

Responds to Julian Lewis, clarifying the current funding arrangement for the BBC World Service, which now receives additional grants from the Foreign Office.

Argues that the use of percentages is a straightforward way to show changes in defence expenditure relative to other high spending Departments. Emphasises the importance of maintaining flexibility and readiness for various threats, ranging from nuclear obliteration to 21st-century threats like terrorism and cyber attacks.

Urges against oversimplifying defence expenditure debates by focusing solely on percentage targets. Proposes a capability-led approach that considers the threat picture, required capabilities, and appropriate funding.

Supports the idea of having key military technologies under domestic control to ensure industrial flexibility in times of disaster. Emphasises the importance of being able to rapidly increase output of weaponry if needed.

West supports her colleague's critique of visa policies impacting scientific collaboration between the UK and Africa, emphasising the detrimental effects on both nations' interests.

Onwurah responds to Catherine West by reiterating concerns over visa policies affecting African scientists. She stresses that continued exclusion of Africans from the UK undermines claims of an open, global Britain post-Brexit.

Rosindell acknowledged Tugendhat's chairmanship of the Foreign Affairs Committee but highlighted his own long-standing efforts to ensure British overseas territories could lay a wreath on Remembrance Sunday, recognising their contributions and sacrifices.

Tugendhat reiterated the strategic goals of ensuring happiness and prosperity for the British people by building an open world with the rule of law, freedom of trade, navigation, climate protection, and human rights. He advocated for partnerships with new independent trading nations as equals, emphasising the importance of recognition over alignment.

Doughty questioned Tugendhat about the horn of Africa, particularly Somaliland, suggesting it as an area where British foreign policy could be brought together to foster trading potential and historical links.

Stresses the importance of a cooperative and integrated approach to international partnerships, highlighting the need for adherence to the rule of law. He criticises China's practices and calls for increased vigilance towards Russia, advocating for nuclear defence. Emphasises the need for an ambitious foreign policy aligned with global opportunities.

Celebrates St Albans' rich historical legacy from Alban to Magna Carta and its thriving pub culture, while expressing concern over the detrimental impact of high business rates on local pubs. Advocates for urgent support measures for small businesses affected by rising property taxes. Discusses environmental issues such as water scarcity in chalk streams and pushes for a moratorium on airport expansion and protection against industrial development threats to green belts.

Flick Drummond congratulates her colleague on a maiden speech and expresses gratitude for the support she has received. She discusses her work with veterans, the National Citizen Service, and highlights the contributions of her predecessor, Sir George Hollingbery. She also touches upon the history and cultural significance of Meon Valley, including its connections to cricket, D-Day preparations during World War II, and its military heritage. Drummond expresses her belief in soft power organisations such as the British Council and BBC World Service, alongside aid budgets and sporting links. She pays tribute to those working in intelligence services and continues to raise awareness about the crisis in Yemen. Additionally, she co-chairs the all-party parliamentary group on women, peace and security to highlight the impact of war on women.

Welcomed back a former MP, praised the maiden speech of another, discussed the assassination of Soleimani in Iraq, highlighted concerns about UK-US relationship changes, proposed objectives for UK policy towards Iran including nuclear non-proliferation and human rights progress, suggested working with regional allies to achieve these goals, raised issues regarding Hong Kong protests and police brutality.

Asked Alistair Carmichael about the necessity of a full inquiry into police brutality in Hong Kong, pressed for more pressure to get facts on such incidents.

Agreed with Catherine West's point about the need for a full inquiry into police brutality in Hong Kong, discussed the neutrality stance of international bodies like UNHCR and ICRC regarding medical aid arrests, proposed that Hong Kongers with BNO passport status should be given the right of abode due to the unsustainability of the current compromise, raised concerns over Human Rights Watch head being denied entry to Hong Kong.

I paid tribute to my predecessor, Jeremy Lefroy, for his dedication to local issues and international development. I support the UK's commitment to global humanitarian efforts and its investment in Africa through the upcoming Africa investment summit. I highlighted Stafford's rich history and literary connections, as well as its strong ties with the military. My priorities include supporting Brexit, protecting our national health service, advocating for fair education funding, conserving environmental standards in agriculture, promoting business growth and infrastructure development, and championing gender equality and conservation.

I complimented Theo Clarke on her maiden speech and highlighted the challenges she faces in representing all of Stafford's villages. I critiqued Tom Tugendhat’s suggestion to work bilaterally with EU countries, arguing that the bloc operates as a unified entity. I also questioned the feasibility of completing a comprehensive trade deal within 11 months and suggested that setting realistic objectives might be more pragmatic.

I responded to Stewart Hosie’s critique by noting examples of bilateral cooperation with France, such as the Lancaster House and Sandhurst agreements. I acknowledged that while there are areas for bilateral cooperation, it is also important to consider the unified approach of the EU bloc.

Welcomes some measures in the Queen’s Speech, such as increased tax credits for research and development. Expresses caution regarding these measures due to their reliance on corporation tax which may not benefit smaller companies. Criticises the programme for government as thin and poor, highlighting it as cruel and narrow-minded. Opposes policies that end free movement of people, arguing they will diminish the UK's ability to attract international talent and weaken its trade capabilities. Emphasises the economic impact of Brexit, suggesting a potential loss of up to 20% in total global trade. Advocates for parliamentary scrutiny, devolved nations' consent on trade deals, protection of NHS and vital industries such as fishing.

Responds to Stewart Hosie's concerns about the economic impact of Brexit. Argues that forecasts do not predict a reduction in trade but rather slower growth rates, suggesting that free movement restrictions will not necessarily lead to a decline in trade volumes.

Asks Stewart Hosie for more details regarding the advice given about the asymmetry of US-UK negotiations. Suggests scepticism towards such extreme views on negotiation dynamics.

The Conservative MP agrees with his colleague's points about respecting democratic outcomes, noting the rise of extremist parties in Europe as a result of ignoring referenda results. He draws attention to the increase of extremist elements in France and the Netherlands, linking it back to how governments ignored clear decisions made by their electorates.

The Conservative MP continues his argument regarding democratic outcomes, referencing extremist views in the recent election. He criticises Labour's relationship with global partners and highlights the importance of defence, advocating for a review of Royal Navy procurement processes to ensure they are efficient and capable of meeting future threats. He also supports infrastructure development such as fibre broadband and transport solutions.

Emphasises the importance of Britain choosing to be a beacon for global justice, international human rights, and tackling climate change. Urges continued spending on international development at 0.7% of gross national income and advocates for increasing it to 1%. Calls for protecting the independence of the Department for International Development and ending civil service recruitment freezes. Condemns leaders like Putin, Orbán, Modi, Bolsonaro, and Trump who reject established rules and human rights.

The speaker delivered a maiden speech, paying tribute to his predecessor Mary Creagh. He discussed the rich history of Wakefield, its contributions to counter-terrorism policing, and the importance of education for young people from disadvantaged backgrounds. Imran also mentioned local companies working on innovative projects such as tinnitus research and weather pattern prediction models. The speaker expressed a desire to work with both sides of the House to improve employment opportunities and create new jobs.

COP26 in November is an opportunity for the UK to assert how climate change should be at the heart of our international trade policy.

Concerned about reports suggesting a spiritual connection between this Government and Viktor Orbán's illiberal regime, which undermines human rights dialogue in international relations.

I am honoured to make my maiden speech on the Queen’s Speech, focusing on the importance of respecting local identities while addressing challenges like hybrid warfare. My constituency is known for its agricultural heritage and two geographically protected delicacies—Melton Mowbray pork pie and Stilton cheese. The history of Rutland highlights the tension between rural and urban interests, exemplified by the county's reclassification in 1974 following UK’s entry into the European Community. I emphasise the need for respect between local and national governance. Regarding foreign policy, hybrid warfare requires a comprehensive defence strategy that includes economic, informational, military, cultural, cyber, diplomatic, criminal, and civil society instruments. To protect our nation, we must fortify all societal levels, not just military infrastructure.

The debate is about maintaining Scotland's place in Europe, emphasising the importance of freedom of movement and criticising the UK's exit from the European Union. The speaker also mentions concerns over Russia's actions in Ukraine and Nord Stream 2 project, calling for a serious approach to international relations and defence funding.

The hon. Gentleman acknowledges the need for reform of procurement across government departments, suggesting that leaving the European Union provides an opportunity for fresh approaches in both Ministry of Defence and other Departments.

Mr Bowie apologises for interrupting the debate but does not provide further details or a substantial contribution.

Mr Baker urges boldness in establishing the UK's relationship with the European Union post-Brexit. He encourages prioritising trade deals, particularly with the United States of America, and argues for regulatory independence while negotiating free trade agreements.

Welcomes the Government’s action on global health but criticises the Queen’s Speech for failing to deliver on issues such as job creation, transport improvements, and public health. Emphasises the need for a proper industrial strategy, reliable public transport funding, and effective policies like a junk food advertising ban. Calls for a Labour programme focused on infrastructure investment and public health action.

Commends the Queen’s Speech for laying foundations to uphold the democratic instruction of Brexit and restoring Britain's sovereignty. Highlights the importance of global trade, Commonwealth relationships, and a new post-Brexit foreign policy focusing on free trade agreements with Europe and the US, while suggesting closer ties with CANZUK nations.

Suggests preferential trading arrangements with Commonwealth countries to complement political ties, in line with Joseph Chamberlain’s approach.

Advocated for a revitalisation of Britain's foreign policy to reflect its global status. Emphasised the need for an independent foreign policy that prioritises free trade agreements without EU constraints.

Celebrated Britain's role as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, NATO founder member, Commonwealth member, and the closest friend and ally of the EU. Highlighted the importance of having a moral compass in foreign policy and cited examples such as humanitarian aid spending and military intervention against chemical weapons use.

Responded briefly to correct a factual point regarding timing but did not provide a full contribution or position statement.

Asked Andrew Bowie about the lack of a long-term plan for Syria and suggested that it was time for a modern-day Marshall Plan to resolve the conflict in Syria.

Expressed regret over the loss of life in Syria, praised British military intervention, lamented lack of long-term strategy, paid tribute to James Le Mesurier, supported government spending on defence, nuclear deterrent, naval carriers, and amphibious assault capabilities.

Paid tribute to the late James Le Mesurier, a key figure in the White Helmets organisation.

Discussed his re-election and support for Brexit delivery. Emphasised the importance of international relations with Commonwealth countries, India, and Israel. Called for accountability regarding war crimes in Sri Lanka, mentioned Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh, and advocated for resolving Cyprus issue.

Questioned Bob Blackman on his stance regarding United Nations resolutions concerning Kashmir.

Called for the observation of United Nations resolutions regarding Pakistan's occupation of Jammu and Kashmir. Advocated for regime change in Iran through support for the National Council of Resistance of Iran. Criticised the inclusion of caste as a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010, urging its removal. Highlighted achievements such as the Homelessness Reduction Act 2017 and emphasised the need to abolish the Vagrancy Act and implement Housing First policy to combat homelessness.

Rob Roberts made his maiden speech, paying tribute to previous speakers and discussing the theme of Britain's place in the world. He highlighted Wales’s place within the UK and mentioned Delyn's features, current situation, and future aspirations for railway improvements and economic growth. He also acknowledged his predecessor David Hanson's respect and integrity during a challenging election campaign.

Smith discusses Britain’s role as a global nation, highlighting the importance of leveraging unique historical links with Commonwealth nations and other countries for trade and diplomatic advantages. He also calls for reducing air passenger duty to enhance international travel and trade opportunities. Furthermore, he addresses the issue of British overseas territories, particularly the Chagos Islands, advocating for their self-determination.

Rosindell supports Henry Smith's stance on the rights and self-determination of the Chagossians, drawing parallels with other British territories like Gibraltar and the Falkland Islands.

Expressed concerns about Eurocentric comments in the debate and highlighted the importance of the Council of Europe, which has 47 member states compared to the EU's 27. He mentioned the Council of Europe's role in refugee assistance and climate change initiatives on a cross-party basis. Emphasised his support for Lord Prescott’s views on climate change and urged more recognition of the Council of Europe's work post-Brexit. Called for the establishment of a Joint Committee to review activities related to the Council of Europe. Highlighted Singapore’s progress in mediation and arbitration services, urging the UK to sign the international Singapore convention and invest in alternative dispute resolution. Stressed the importance of trade relations with Israel, citing it as the second-largest trading partner for the UK. Mentioned his role as Vice-Chairman of the Conservative Friends of Israel and highlighted advanced technology from Israeli ambulance service that could be adopted in the UK to save lives. Lastly, emphasised Nigeria's significance as a future market and stressed the need to support Africa’s development.

Mr Seely commended the excellent maiden speeches given by new Members, praised the foreign affairs review's foresight and emphasised the importance of a national global strategy. He suggested establishing a Janus-like organisation within the National Security Council to develop such strategies for future threats and opportunities. Additionally, he proposed more joint effects working across government departments and advocated for closer ties with CANZUK nations while maintaining multilateralism. Mr Seely highlighted the critical issue of Huawei's potential involvement in the UK's 5G network, stressing the need for robust scrutiny and debate on this matter. He argued that allowing Huawei a role in the 5G system would enable China to access our networks and undermine western firms. He concluded by urging an immediate investigation into the suitability of Chinese high tech in British systems.

The UK should choose between siding with human rights abusers and bully-boy Presidents or supporting international law, peace, and diplomacy. The Government's actions have too often put this country on the wrong side of that divide by selling weapons to Saudi Arabia, building friendships with controversial nationalists like Viktor Orbán, conducting trade talks with the US to sell off NHS, funding fossil fuel industries overseas through export finance and UK aid, and failing to condemn President Trump’s foreign policy decisions. The Government must be brave enough to stand up to reckless actions and rhetoric of all world leaders and use diplomacy to speak up for international law. Dan Carden also questioned whether the government is committed to an independent Department for International Development with its own Secretary of State and maintaining the UK’s 0.7% commitment on overseas aid.

Welcomed new Members making their maiden speeches; emphasised Britain's role in promoting global development and strengthening international alliances. Stressed the importance of fair trade deals, defence spending, and addressing climate change.

Not directly quoted but mentioned positively by Stephenson for speaking about Wales’s place in Britain and the role of Airbus factories.

Praised for her maiden speech addressing diplomatic and national security challenges, commended for her expertise on these issues.

Her contribution was appreciated regarding pub life in Britain, highlighted the importance of keeping Britain open to business and collaboration on science and climate change.

He supports a positive, one nation vision for the country and world leadership. He contrasts this with Opposition Members who he believes have not learned from past elections and want to undermine Britain.

He agrees with Alec Shelbrooke, highlighting the contrast between Government optimism and Opposition pessimism. He mentions that the British people have given the Government a mandate to proceed and deliver on it.