← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Acquired Brain Injury Action Plan

04 December 2025

Lead MP

John Hayes
South Holland and The Deepings
Con

Responding Minister

Ashley Dalton

Tags

Employment
Word Count: 12322
Other Contributors: 10

At a Glance

John Hayes raised concerns about acquired brain injury action plan in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The lead MP calls for a cross-departmental approach to brain injury and argues for the creation of a statutory right to rehab in every region.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

South Holland and The Deepings
Opened the debate
Around 350,000 people a year are admitted to hospital with acquired brain injury—that is one every 90 seconds. About 125,000 of those are admitted following a traumatic brain injury, around 43,000 with brain tumours and others following strokes. The cost to the UK economy through healthcare, social care, lost productivity and wider public services is £43 billion annually, which equates to 1.3% of GDP.

Government Response

Ashley Dalton
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
Government Response
The Minister acknowledges the importance of the debate on acquired brain injury, highlighting efforts to prevent brain injuries through public awareness campaigns, blood pressure checks in pharmacies, and the roll-out of mechanical thrombectomy services. She confirms plans to ensure universal access to these services by Easter next year. The Minister also addresses concerns about social care integration and neuro-rehabilitation services, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive plan with clear delivery timelines. Details the Government’s commitment to a comprehensive ABI action plan alongside the 10-year health and workforce plans, emphasizing collaborative work across government sectors.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.