← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Academic Technology Approval Scheme

13 January 2026

Lead MP

Wendy Chamberlain
North East Fife
LD

Responding Minister

Seema Malhotra

Tags

Foreign Affairs
Word Count: 4149
Other Contributors: 3

At a Glance

Wendy Chamberlain raised concerns about academic technology approval scheme in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The MP asks the Minister to consider extending the standard processing period from 30 working days to 40 or even 50 days and formalising this into a service-level agreement. She also inquires about the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office's capacity for handling ATAS applications.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

North East Fife
Opened the debate
The Academic Technology Approval Scheme (ATAS) delays have caused significant issues for international students and researchers. Delays of up to six months are common, leading to missed start dates for research programmes and causing stress for universities and funding providers.

Government Response

Seema Malhotra
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs
Government Response
Acknowledges the importance of feedback on improving services and attracting global talent to support UK’s economy. Emphasises the need for a balanced approach in security matters while promoting international research collaboration. Will seek responses to specific concerns raised about ATAS delays. Acknowledged the importance of balancing national security with attracting global research talent, noted increasing demand for ATAS applications, promised to engage universities in improving responsiveness and transparency, and emphasised government investment in R&D.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.