← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Freedom of Religion or Belief: UK Foreign Policy
17 July 2025
Lead MP
David Smith
North Northumberland
Lab
Responding Minister
Catherine West
Tags
Foreign Affairs
Word Count: 13405
Other Contributors: 13
At a Glance
David Smith raised concerns about freedom of religion or belief: uk foreign policy in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
The Government's new freedom of religion or belief strategy aims to reduce the number of countries where FORB is significantly curtailed and promote FORB internationally as essential to human flourishing. The strategy includes engagement with multilateral institutions and forums to maintain collective support for FORB around the world.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
According to the Pew Research Centre, the number of countries with high or very high levels of Government restrictions on freedom of religion or belief is at its highest level since 2007. Additionally, Open Doors reports that 380 million Christians are persecuted worldwide because of their faith. These issues encompass social ostracism, police harassment, arbitrary detention, denial of citizenship, assault, destruction of religious sites, torture, and killings in various parts of the world.
Andrew Rosindell
Con
Romford
Commemorated the work of Fiona Bruce and highlighted the importance of upholding religious freedom around the world, questioning whether the UK is truly using its influence to lead on this issue. Supports John Slinger's point and urges the minister to take note of the case highlighted.
Anna Dixon
Lab
Shipley
She highlighted the grave situation facing Christian communities in Syria following recent attacks, expressing concern about the consistency of diplomatic pressure in priority countries.
Catherine West
Lab
Poplar and Limehouse
Acknowledged lobbying efforts in Laos for religious freedom rights, discussed programme funding safety, and highlighted UK’s role in international human rights alliances.
Epsom and Ewell
Asked Markus Campbell-Savours about the impact of cuts to official development assistance on promoting religious freedom abroad.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
The hon. Gentleman acknowledges the deputation to Nigeria that went through the APPG for international freedom of religion or belief and contributed to Mubarak Bala’s release. Expressed appreciation for the role of religion in foreign policy, highlighted the importance of providing information to local churches, and thanked the Minister for her support of Christians in Sudan. Agreed with the importance of standing alongside religious communities in difficult regions, especially during times when Daesh was active. Emphasized that defending FORB does not favour one faith over another but upholds the dignity of every individual's beliefs.
John Glen
Con
Salisbury
The envoy is at the centre of a web of relationships with people in this country who champion input and enthusiasms of constituents, such as Merv Thomas, president and founder of Christian Solidarity Worldwide.
John Slinger
Con
Strangford
Asked whether the UK Government must strengthen places like Erbil within Iraq that offer safety to Christians and other religious communities. Highlights a case of Mehran Shamloui, a Christian detained in Iran after fleeing for his faith. Emphasises the need to focus on such cases. Visited the Yazidi holiest temple, commending the Kurdistan Regional Government's efforts to rescue abducted individuals.
Lizzi Collinge
Lab
Morecambe and Lunesdale
Religious persecution is a global issue threatening fundamental rights. In Morecambe and Lunesdale, over 40 churches reflect freedom of belief, but this freedom is not universal; in places like India and Iran, people face severe restrictions and state-permitted persecution.
Penrith and Solway
Shared personal reflections on his Christian faith and heritage, highlighting the historical example of Thorgeir of Lightwater who promoted religious freedom in Iceland.
Newton Abbot
He expressed deep concern about the growing threat to human rights internationally, noting that religious minorities face harassment, discrimination and persecution in many countries. He urged the Government to take a more active approach in driving real progress on rights and freedoms.
Sam Rushworth
Lab
Bishop Auckland
Praised David Smith for his appointment as envoy and acknowledged cross-party consensus on the importance of freedom of religion or belief, highlighting the need to integrate FORB across all foreign policy conversations. The Member emphasised the need to recognise the emotional and psychological needs of marginalised communities and provided examples from around the world where assistance was given to enable people to live their faith.
Shockat Adam
Ind
Leicester South
Asked about the situation in Xinjiang, noting more than 1 million Muslim Uyghurs in prison camps and emphasizing the importance of ensuring that products made there do not reach UK high streets.
Jeremy Hunt
Con
Godalming and Ash
Sir Jeremy Hunt thanked David Smith for his work as religious freedom envoy, stating that foreign policy has not done enough on freedom of religion or belief due to political correctness. He agreed that countries eroding religious freedoms often erode other freedoms as well.
Government Response
Catherine West
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs
Government Response
Reiterates the Government’s commitment to defending freedom of religion or belief. Launches a targeted approach focusing on 10 countries while remaining responsive to other situations globally. Highlights the importance of human rights in national interest. Confirmed the John Bunyan fund's safety from reductions, acknowledged the importance of initiatives like rescuing abducted individuals in Iraq, and reiterated commitment to multilateral efforts for freedom of religion or belief.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.