← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Postural Tachycardia Syndrome

14 October 2025

Lead MP

Cat Smith
Lancaster and Wyre
Lab

Responding Minister

Ashley Dalton

Tags

NHSEconomy
Word Count: 4583
Other Contributors: 16

At a Glance

Cat Smith raised concerns about postural tachycardia syndrome in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The Government should improve PoTS diagnoses as a priority, provide national clinical guidelines for consistent care, and ensure accessible treatment across the UK, regardless of where patients live.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Lancaster and Wyre
Opened the debate
The national health service often overlooks, misunderstands, and under-resources postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (PoTS), leading to long diagnostic periods and inadequate support. The average diagnosis time is seven years with many initially misdiagnosed with mental health conditions.

Government Response

Ashley Dalton
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
Government Response
Postural tachycardia syndrome affects around 120,000 people in the UK. The Government is working on improving diagnosis through NICE guidance and recognises the need to address systemic barriers to care and reduce postcode lottery issues for PoTS patients. Acknowledged the need for systematic data and research, mentioned NIHR funding a study with over £3 million to examine connections between long covid and PoTS. Announced willingness to meet specialists to discuss progress. Addressed economic impacts by referencing the ‘Get Britain Working’ plan to support people with health conditions into work. Emphasised standardising and coordinating care across settings and improving patient outcomes through the Government’s 10-year plan for health.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.