← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Non-surgical Aesthetic and Cosmetic Treatments

11 September 2025

Lead MP

Bradley Thomas
Bromsgrove
Con

Responding Minister

Karin Smyth

Tags

NHS
Word Count: 10210
Other Contributors: 7

At a Glance

Bradley Thomas raised concerns about non-surgical aesthetic and cosmetic treatments in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Proposes stricter regulations on advertising images in cosmetic industry and requiring all images and videos used to display if digitally altered or enhanced. Also suggests expanding the Secretary of State's powers to introduce regulations on operations, making 'surgeon' a protected title.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Bromsgrove
Opened the debate
In 2023 alone, around 7.7 million people in the UK underwent cosmetic and aesthetic treatments, leading to a public health crisis due to lack of regulation. Sixty-one percent of adults and 66% of children reported negative body image issues, with 80% experiencing mental health harm from such concerns. An estimated 1.25 million people live with eating disorders, hospital admissions for which rose by 84% between 2015 and 2021.

Government Response

Karin Smyth
The Minister for Secondary Care
Government Response
We will regulate high-risk cosmetic procedures under the Care Quality Commission, ensuring only suitably qualified healthcare professionals perform them. We will introduce a local authority licensing scheme for lower-risk procedures like botox and lip fillers, requiring rigorous safety training and insurance standards. The consultation received over 11,800 responses and detailed proposals will be set out in the new year to seek views from local authorities on enforcement powers and costs.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.