← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

West Bank: Forced Displacement

02 July 2025

Lead MP

Martin Rhodes
Glasgow North
Lab

Responding Minister

Mr Hamish Falconer

Tags

Foreign Affairs
Word Count: 11167
Other Contributors: 21

At a Glance

Martin Rhodes raised concerns about west bank: forced displacement in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The UK should formally recognise the state of Palestine as soon as possible and address issues such as illegal settlements, forced displacement, and attacks on healthcare facilities.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Glasgow North
Opened the debate
The Palestinian people face intolerable hardship, suffering and misery. Amnesty International reports that Israel’s military operations over the past four months have led to the largest displacement of Palestinians since the 1967 war. Save the Children reports almost half of all Palestinian children killed by Israeli forces or settlers in the occupied West Bank since records began were killed in the past two years.

Government Response

Mr Hamish Falconer
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs
Government Response
Provided updates on consular assistance, highlighted the increase in settlement expansions, condemned violence against Palestinians, and discussed measures taken to hold individuals accountable for inciting and supporting violence. Announced sanctions against extremist Israeli Government Ministers Ben-Gvir and Smotrich. Explained that no goods should be sold in the UK as though they were Israeli or under Israeli privileges if they emanate from the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Mentioned complexities in ensuring fully illegal status and lack of European nation taking such a step but keeping it under review.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.