← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

National Resilience and Preparedness

07 January 2025

Lead MP

Richard Foord
Honiton and Sidmouth
LD

Responding Minister

Ms Abena Oppong-Asare

Tags

No tags
Word Count: 3710
Other Contributors: 4

At a Glance

Richard Foord raised concerns about national resilience and preparedness in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

I want to focus on three areas: future pandemics, food security and hybrid threats. The Government should act swiftly to implement the inquiry’s recommendations and engage with international frameworks such as the World Health Organisation treaty.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Honiton and Sidmouth
Opened the debate
The covid-19 pandemic exposed critical weaknesses in the planning and preparedness for large-scale emergencies. Over 200,000 excess deaths have been attributed to the pandemic in the UK, many of which may have been preventable with better planning and resilience.

Government Response

Ms Abena Oppong-Asare
The Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office
Government Response
Since coming into office, we have taken immediate steps to strengthen national resilience by establishing a dedicated sub-committee of the National Security Council on resilience. We are looking at how we can improve our approach to national risk assessment and designing a national exercising programme. The Government has also adopted the 2023 biological security strategy in full. I will hold parliamentary drop-in sessions this month, inviting Members of both Houses to discuss the review progress and gather views on where our approach to resilience could be bolstered.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.