← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Access to Banking Hubs: Hertfordshire

25 June 2025

Lead MP

Gagan Mohindra
South West Hertfordshire
Con

Responding Minister

Emma Reynolds

Tags

EconomyTaxation
Word Count: 9619
Other Contributors: 13

At a Glance

Gagan Mohindra raised concerns about access to banking hubs: hertfordshire in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

He calls on the Minister for more funding to establish additional banking hubs, particularly in rural and semi-rural areas where face-to-face services are crucial.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

South West Hertfordshire
Opened the debate
Mr Gagan Mohindra points out that access to banking services is critical, especially for those unable or less comfortable with online banking. He notes the significant reduction in bank branches since 2015 and highlights the lack of banking hubs in his constituency compared to other areas. Post offices are essential but do not provide the same level of service as a dedicated banking hub.

Government Response

Emma Reynolds
The Economic Secretary to the Treasury
Government Response
Acknowledges the concerns raised and the importance of community engagement in deciding the location of banking hubs. Emphasises support for rural areas and private sector innovation, such as multi-bank kiosks. Discussed the significant changes in retail banking due to technological advancements, acknowledged the importance of branches for vulnerable groups and small businesses. Emphasized the Government's commitment to rolling out 350 banking hubs, with more than half already agreed and over 170 open since the general election. Stated that Parliament legislated to protect reasonable access to cash through the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 but did not include in-person banking access.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.