← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Military Co-operation with Israel

18 March 2025

Lead MP

Shockat Adam
Leicester South
Ind

Responding Minister

Luke Pollard

Tags

DefenceForeign Affairs
Word Count: 8645
Other Contributors: 12

At a Glance

Shockat Adam raised concerns about military co-operation with israel in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The lead MP asks for immediate action from the Government, including summoning the Israeli ambassador and considering economic sanctions to uphold moral responsibility and international law.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Leicester South
Opened the debate
The debate centres on the recent Israeli airstrikes that killed over 400 people, potentially facilitated by British military co-operation and intelligence sharing. It highlights the violation of international law and raises questions about UK's role in enabling war crimes. The debate also addresses the denial of essential resources to Gaza and its impact on civilians.

Government Response

Luke Pollard
The Minister for the Armed Forces
Government Response
The minister emphasised that reported civilian casualties from Israel’s actions are appalling, calling for dialogue to ensure a ceasefire is implemented. He also noted the UK's strategic partnership with Israel, including defence education and joint training. The minister reassured hon. Members that RAF surveillance flights over Gaza support hostage rescue efforts in accordance with international humanitarian law. Discussed the review of Israel’s compliance with international humanitarian law and the suspension of relevant export licences to Israel, excluding components for the F-35 programme. Emphasised that the UK Government remains steadfast in its support for Israel but must maintain a robust arms export licensing regime.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.