← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Flood Risk and Flood Defence Infrastructure: North-west England

18 November 2025

Lead MP

Sarah Hall
Warrington South
Lab/Co-op

Responding Minister

Emma Hardy

Tags

NHSClimate
Word Count: 9427
Other Contributors: 13

At a Glance

Sarah Hall raised concerns about flood risk and flood defence infrastructure: north-west england in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Sarah Hall asks for investment in sewerage infrastructure alongside flood walls, better maintenance of existing watercourses, and a commitment to the Sankey brook flood risk management scheme with clear funding guarantees.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Sarah Hall Lab/Co-op
Warrington South
Opened the debate
People in Warrington South face constant risk of flooding, which affects their daily lives and mental health. Extreme rainfall and overwhelmed watercourses cause frequent floods, leaving communities vulnerable and marooned. The area is prone to flooding due to historical planning decisions and the region's contribution to the national economy should warrant better infrastructure support.

Government Response

Emma Hardy
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Government Response
Acknowledged the increase in flood and coastal erosion risk due to climate change and emphasised the need to address these issues at COP27. Confirmed ongoing support for natural flood management schemes under ELMS and highlighted the Government's commitment to robust support for those affected by flooding. Announces increased funding for flooding resilience, including £188 million increase in the EA budget this year. Highlights improvements in flood warning systems and forecasting accuracy, with a new system going live on 21 October.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.