← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Educational Assessment System Reform

15 October 2025

Lead MP

Josh Dean
Hertford and Stortford
Lab

Responding Minister

Georgia Gould

Tags

NHS
Word Count: 14618
Other Contributors: 19

At a Glance

Josh Dean raised concerns about educational assessment system reform in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The system should be reformed to provide flexibility and support for all students, ensuring a fairer approach to assessment where wellbeing and academic success are not at odds with one another.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Hertford and Stortford
Opened the debate
Over a million pupils will have access to school-based mental health support, but exams are causing significant stress. Research shows that over 60% of GCSE and A-level students struggle during exam season, experiencing panic attacks or suicidal thoughts. Sixteen-year-olds in England spend approximately 31.5 hours sitting their GCSE exams compared to other countries like Australia, Canada, Poland, and the Republic of Ireland.

Government Response

Georgia Gould
The Minister for School Standards
Government Response
Stresses the commitment to high standards and ensuring no child is left behind. Discusses mental health support initiatives, including expanding mental health support teams to cover 60% of pupils by April 2026 and aiming for full coverage by 2029-30. Emphasises the importance of well-designed assessments in supporting young people's development. The minister reassured concerns about primary assessments, including SATs, noting that they help pupils build necessary skills but should not cause undue stress. They stated that schools must balance assessment preparation with providing a broad education and referenced Ofsted’s focus on inclusion.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.