← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Hydrogen-powered Aviation

17 June 2025

Lead MP

Sadik Al-Hassan
North Somerset
Lab

Responding Minister

Robert Courts

Tags

DefenceEconomyClimate
Word Count: 8261
Other Contributors: 6

At a Glance

Sadik Al-Hassan raised concerns about hydrogen-powered aviation in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Calls on the Government to provide clear policy guidance and financial support for the development of hydrogen-powered aviation to ensure that the UK does not miss out on this critical opportunity for environmental and economic leadership.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

North Somerset
Opened the debate
Bristol airport aims to achieve net zero emissions by 2030 while expanding to serve up to 15 million passengers annually. The current difficulty in decarbonising aviation, with kerosene being the primary fuel and no cost-competitive sustainable alternatives available yet, poses a significant challenge.

Government Response

Robert Courts
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport
Government Response
I recognise the clear potential of hydrogen as a zero emission aviation fuel and what it could contribute towards greener aviation. The Government have already acted to support the use of low-carbon hydrogen in aviation through the SAF mandate, with eligible hydrogen rewarded through the provision of tradeable SAF certificates. We are investing more than £3 billion over four years in advanced manufacturing for zero-emission vehicles, batteries and aerospace technologies. Importantly, one of the task and finish groups of the Jet Zero Taskforce is reviewing barriers to the commercial operation of hydrogen aircraft.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.