← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Legal and Illegal Migration: Suspension
10 March 2025
Lead MP
Dave Robertson
Lichfield
Lab
Responding Minister
Dan Jarvis
Tags
ImmigrationMigrants & BordersBusiness Compliance
Word Count: 19403
Other Contributors: 9
At a Glance
Dave Robertson raised concerns about legal and illegal migration: suspension in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
The petition calls for a temporary halt to all immigration, both illegal and legal, for five years as a response to the current situation. The debate aims to address these concerns in detail without dismissing the contributions of migrants or polarising views on immigration.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
The petition e-petition 700824 received 219,000 signatures expressing concerns over the rapid rise of immigration in Britain. The petitioner and many voters are worried that migration figures have grown too quickly, with net migration since 2021 reaching unprecedented levels, well above pre-pandemic estimates.
Carla Denyer
Green
Bristol Central
Disagreed with the petition and argued that migration is beneficial for the economy, filling labour shortages and contributing to growth. Commented that the NHS was well-funded in the past, highlighting historical context. Provided clear views challenging the government's approach to immigration and asylum policies.
Dave Robertson
SNP
Henderson
Asked about the influence of the European Court of Human Rights on asylum success rates in the '80s and '90s.
Scott Arthur
Lab
Edinburgh South West
Challenges Sir John Hayes by highlighting his own experience with an overseas healthcare worker, pointing out that without immigration, particularly for healthcare workers, the system may struggle to cope.
Jacob Collier
Con
Burton and Uttoxeter
Noted reliance on 160,000 overseas NHS workers but also stressed the need for manageable migration levels.
Josh Newbury
Lab
Cannock Chase
Acknowledged the importance of discussing immigration without it being racist or intolerant, and noted that his constituency had a high number of signatures on an e-petition regarding immigration. Made his first speech in Westminster Hall, focusing on linking immigration policies with skills, training and education.
Lee Anderson
Reform
Ashfield
The MP questioned whether British students going abroad for study bring their families along and agreed with the right hon. Gentleman that it was preposterous to allow international students to bring dependants. Asked about the economic impact of migration, highlighting the existence of 7 million economically inactive people in the UK.
Olly Glover
Con
Didcot and Wantage
He thanked participants for their contributions and emphasised the need for respectful debate, noting the importance of migrant contributions to society. Discussed his Polish heritage and highlighted the role of good public services in managing immigration issues.
Richard Tice
Reform
Boston and Skegness
The MP made a humorous comment about the right hon. Member enjoying the Clapham omnibus experience, suggesting he should try taking a bus in his own constituency. Calls for proper planning of infrastructure to accommodate population growth, criticises lack of control over migration leading to pressures on housing and healthcare. Discussed the challenges of population growth and suggested a policy of net zero immigration to match emigration. Criticised the current system for training healthcare workers. The MP highlighted significant issues with illegal working, including the exploitation of delivery workers through sub-accounts on apps. He also pointed out flaws in the system that allow for illegal legal migration. Emphasised the importance of having a plan for migration policies and suggested that previous approaches lacked one.
John Hayes
Con
South Holland and The Deepings
Asked about the economic value brought by immigrants with dependants who require services such as education or healthcare, highlighting that these individuals do not contribute economically but are valuable in other ways. Asked the lead MP about practical measures to address rapid growth in demand, highlighting that no Government could cope with a scale of growth such as last year's 700,000 new GP registrations. Argued against immigration due to its negative impact on productivity and competitiveness. He provided figures on the cost of housing asylum seekers and discussed the need for a different approach to tackle illegal migration. He agreed that reducing unemployment and improving skills training is crucial for addressing labour market issues. He supports the idea of a multi-ethnic society but emphasises the importance of building a cohesive civil society based on shared values. Discussed economic value of family migrants and quoted CS Lewis.
Government Response
Dan Jarvis
The Minister for Security
Government Response
Acknowledges the debate initiated by the Petitions Committee and expresses gratitude towards the MP for introducing the topic in a sensible manner. However, the minister does not provide specific details regarding ILR extensions or plans to address immigration volumes. Discussed legal migration levels, illegal migration challenges, border security command, cooperation with partners, illegal working visits, removals, clearing the asylum backlog, Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill. Addressed the petition's suggestion to suspend all immigration for five years by emphasizing secure borders and fair effective policies.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.