← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Digital Landlines: Rural Communities

02 April 2025

Lead MP

Damian Hinds
East Hampshire
Con

Responding Minister

Chris Bryant

Tags

No tags
Word Count: 5082
Other Contributors: 15

At a Glance

Damian Hinds raised concerns about digital landlines: rural communities in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The Government should take a more proactive role in ensuring that vulnerable residents are identified and assisted through the transition to digital landlines, potentially expanding data-sharing agreements with local authorities and housing associations. The Minister should also consider ways to address connectivity issues for areas where commercial fibre delivery is not planned.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

East Hampshire
Opened the debate
The transition from analogue telephony to digital landlines raises concerns about resilience, scalability, and flexibility. The roll-out of VoIP is an industry-led initiative but the issues it brings are societal and regulatory in nature. Issues such as electricity cut-outs and storms pose problems for those reliant on landlines, especially in rural areas where mobile phone signals may be poor or non-existent. Constituents have expressed concerns about losing their means of contact during power cuts, particularly elderly individuals who rely heavily on their landline connections.

Government Response

Chris Bryant
The Minister for Data Protection and Telecoms
Government Response
Acknowledged copper network failures increasing daily; confirmed full list of vulnerable customers from local authorities provided; mentioned resilience measures like longer battery backup times introduced.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.