← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Listed Places of Worship Scheme

22 January 2025

Lead MP

Bradley Thomas
Bromsgrove
Con

Responding Minister

Chris Bryant

Tags

Community Security
Word Count: 14619
Other Contributors: 27

At a Glance

Bradley Thomas raised concerns about listed places of worship scheme in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The current Government should recognise the value of the scheme that was introduced in 2001 by the Labour Government, and extend it given its economic and social benefits. The scheme should be extended to safeguard the future of some of our most important local heritage and ensure church buildings remain structurally safe.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Bromsgrove
Opened the debate
There are about 20,000 listed cathedrals, churches and chapels in the UK with a backlog of repairs to parish churches estimated at more than £1 billion. The listed places of worship grant scheme is due to close on 31 March 2025 and there are currently no extensions or alternatives known about.

Government Response

Chris Bryant
The Minister for Creative Industries, Arts and Tourism
Government Response
Discussed the challenges faced by listed places of worship due to dwindling congregations and the need for financial support. Emphasised the importance of churches as community hubs and pledged to work with all MPs on this issue. Announced that the listed places of worship grant scheme will continue with a budget of £23 million in 2025-26, subject to a cap on claims per year at £25,000. Stressed financial constraints and competing priorities within the Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.