← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Lasting Power of Attorney

28 October 2025

Lead MP

Fabian Hamilton
Leeds North East
Lab

Responding Minister

Sarah Sackman

Tags

No tags
Word Count: 4407
Other Contributors: 6

At a Glance

Fabian Hamilton raised concerns about lasting power of attorney in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Implement Government-regulated safeguarding procedures for banks dealing with LPAs, including requirements to contact donors or GPs before LPA activation and monitoring spending both pre- and post-activation.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Leeds North East
Opened the debate
The vast majority of lasting powers of attorney have no issues; however, abuse by a small minority continues to occur. Since the campaign to end LPA abuse began, hundreds of testimonies from across the country have been received, detailing cases where vulnerable people's funds were stolen or misused. The Office of the Public Guardian reports that there has been a 6.5% increase in concerns about abuse and only 34.5% of such issues lead to full investigations.

Government Response

Sarah Sackman
The Minister of State, Ministry of Justice
Government Response
The minister acknowledged the serious issues raised and expressed deep sympathy for those affected. She highlighted that while cases of abuse are rare, they have serious consequences. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 provides a framework to support individuals who may lack capacity to make decisions, with LPAs enabling empowerment. Safeguards include pre-registration certificates confirming understanding and freedom from undue pressure, statutory objection rights for attorneys and third parties, investigations by the OPG leading to court action when necessary, and enforcement powers of the Court of Protection to protect donors.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.