← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Gavi and the Global Fund

15 May 2025

Lead MP

Emily Darlington
Milton Keynes Central
Lab

Responding Minister

Stephen Doughty

Tags

No tags
Word Count: 12709
Other Contributors: 19

At a Glance

Emily Darlington raised concerns about gavi and the global fund in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The UK needs to continue its support for Gavi and the Global Fund to maintain immunisation funding priorities and protect global health security.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Milton Keynes Central
Opened the debate
The organisations highlighted in the debate—Gavi, the Global Fund, among others—have saved over 18 million lives by reducing avoidable deaths and lowering childhood mortality rates. However, proposed funding cuts could result in between 4.4 million to 10.8 million additional HIV cases, with up to 2.9 million HIV-related deaths predicted by 2030.

Government Response

Stephen Doughty
The Minister of State, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Government Response
Responded positively to the debate highlighting the importance of global health and thanked Emily Darlington for securing it. Mentioned his connections with Milton Keynes through World Vision and did not provide specific financial commitments or changes in strategic direction. Stressed the UK’s commitment to global health through partnerships with Gavi and the Global Fund. Mentioned that the government will continue to champion these organisations post-spending review. Acknowledged the shadow spokespeople's concerns, reiterated the Government's commitment to development and global health despite challenging circumstances. Emphasised that the UK will continue to champion global health, work hard with partners, and make important decisions considering all voices heard in the debate.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.