← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Spending Review 2025: Scotland

02 July 2025

Lead MP

Graeme Downie
Dunfermline and Dollar
Lab

Responding Minister

Kirsty McNeill

Tags

DefenceHousingScotland
Word Count: 13554
Other Contributors: 12

At a Glance

Graeme Downie raised concerns about spending review 2025: scotland in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Graeme Downie asks for more focus on outcomes in budgeting and expresses concern over the SNP's mismanagement of public funds, urging the Government to ensure a fair share of funding for Scotland.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Dunfermline and Dollar
Opened the debate
On behalf of the Scottish contingent, Graeme Downie acknowledges significant investments such as £25 million for the Forth green freeport, but expresses concern over house building being down in Scotland with 10,000 children remaining in temporary accommodation. He also highlights failures in housing and healthcare services by the SNP government, noting that a third of cases received are from people with problems relating to devolved policy areas.

Government Response

Kirsty McNeill
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Scotland
Government Response
Confirmed the UK Government's commitment to increasing defence spending, securing long-term future of HM Naval Base Clyde through £250 million investment over three years. Announced £1.7 billion investment in local communities and city regions across Scotland, including a £452 million four-year commitment for city region and growth deals. Emphasised the record financial support given to Scotland and defended the government's approach to welfare reforms, highlighting ongoing conversations with the Scottish Government on various policies.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.