← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Fly-tipping: Tatton

26 March 2025

Lead MP

Esther McVey
Tatton
Con

Responding Minister

Mary Creagh

Tags

Taxation
Word Count: 3792
Other Contributors: 4

At a Glance

Esther McVey raised concerns about fly-tipping: tatton in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The Government should consider reintroducing measures such as putting points on driving licences for individuals found guilty of fly-tipping, and support local councils to maintain public areas. Additionally, there is a need for tougher penalties and increased enforcement against those who commit this crime.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Tatton
Opened the debate
Local residents frequently report fly-tipping incidents. In 2023-24, there were 1.15 million reported cases of fly-tipping in England, a 6% increase from the previous year. The most common size category was equivalent to a small vanload (31%) and car boot load or less (28%). Residents are upset by the impact on their communities and the difficulty in reporting these incidents.

Government Response

Mary Creagh
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Government Response
Local councils reported over a million fly-tipping incidents in 2023-24. The Government is committed to tackling this issue through enforcement strategies and seeking powers through the Crime and Policing Bill to provide statutory enforcement guidance for local authorities. Stressed the importance of household waste recycling centres and mentioned that councils decide whether they will continue charging for collection of garden waste. Discussed working with councils to tackle fly-tipping through innovative methods like a Facebook wall of shame in Coventry.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.