← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Sport England: Tackling Racism

09 July 2025

Lead MP

Naz Shah
Bradford West
Lab

Responding Minister

Stephanie Peacock

Tags

No tags
Word Count: 4799
Other Contributors: 3

At a Glance

Naz Shah raised concerns about sport england: tackling racism in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Sport England should uphold its policies against racism, investigate the issues faced by Onna Ju-Jitsu and ensure accountability from organisations like the BJJA that have failed in providing fair treatment and transparency.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Bradford West
Opened the debate
Racism exists within sports across the country and impacts grassroots clubs in marginalised communities, exemplified by Onna Ju-Jitsu club in Bradford West. The club has faced systemic discrimination at national championships, denying competitors of ethnic minority backgrounds their rightful medals and causing them to leave sport without justice.

Government Response

Stephanie Peacock
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport
Government Response
The Minister acknowledged the importance of addressing racism in sport and expressed commitment to stamping it out at all levels. She mentioned meeting with Sport England to discuss specific cases involving national governing bodies such as the British Ju-Jitsu Association. Addressed the conditions imposed on the British Ju-Jitsu Association to ensure cultural change, noting ongoing scrutiny by Sport England. Acknowledged concerns raised about how cases are handled and stated that a review is underway to consider wider factors in recognition criteria.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.