← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

English Football: Financial Sustainability and Governance

06 March 2025

Lead MP

Yuan Yang
Earley and Woodley
Lab

Responding Minister

Stephanie Peacock

Tags

No tags
Word Count: 14626
Other Contributors: 33

At a Glance

Yuan Yang raised concerns about english football: financial sustainability and governance in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The lead MP asks for a more equitable distribution of funding between clubs to protect the football pyramid and ensure its sustainability. This includes addressing income inequality caused by broadcast deals that benefit only top-tier clubs, as well as unsustainable spending driven up by wage pressures.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Earley and Woodley
Opened the debate
Clubs across the country face unsustainable finances and poor governance, with over 50 clubs in the top six tiers having gone into administration. According to research by Fair Game, the majority of the top 92 clubs are technically insolvent, meaning their liabilities exceed assets. Reading FC, in particular, is on the brink after four winding-up petitions, five points deductions, and persistent late tax payments.

Government Response

Stephanie Peacock
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport
Government Response
Acknowledged the importance of English football to communities and its economic contribution. Addressed questions about governance changes and regulatory oversight in response to fan concerns. Discussed the Football Governance Bill's aim to secure financial sustainability and protect club heritage.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.