← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Children with Allergies: School Safeguarding

03 July 2025

Lead MP

Chris Bloore
Redditch
Lab

Responding Minister

Stephen Morgan

Tags

Education
Word Count: 10277
Other Contributors: 9

At a Glance

Chris Bloore raised concerns about children with allergies: school safeguarding in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The hon. Member proposes the creation of a cross-departmental allergy tsar who could advise the Government on all the ways that allergies affect the sufferer.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Redditch
Opened the debate
One in three people in the UK now live with allergic disease. Hospital admissions for allergic reactions have risen by over 160% in the past 20 years, and 50% of children are now affected by at least one allergic condition. Every year, approximately 43,000 new cases of child allergy require care.

Government Response

Stephen Morgan
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Education
Government Response
Acknowledged the importance of the debate and contributions from MPs, noting progress made such as Natasha’s law and statutory school food standards. Emphasised ongoing efforts to improve allergy management in schools. I absolutely understand that allergies can be worrying for parents and pupils. When parents send their children to school, it is only right and natural that they expect them to be kept safe. For parents of children with allergies, there is understandably an additional level of concern. Allergies are therefore a highly individual condition, so there is no one-size-fits-all approach... The Department for Education works closely with the Food Standards Agency on all matters relating to school food. Beyond this, families are also able to play an important role in managing their child’s condition.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.