← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Less Survivable Cancers

06 January 2026

Lead MP

Clive Jones
Wokingham
LD

Responding Minister

Ashley Dalton

Tags

NHS
Word Count: 13030
Other Contributors: 18

At a Glance

Clive Jones raised concerns about less survivable cancers in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The national cancer plan must address key measures to improve outcomes for patients with less survivable cancers. This includes supporting the roll-out of innovative detection tests and evaluating their use, as well as producing a strategy for earlier and faster diagnosis.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Wokingham
Opened the debate
Every year in the UK, 90,000 people are diagnosed with a less survivable cancer—cancers of the brain, liver, lungs, pancreas, oesophagus and stomach. Together, they represent 40% of all cancer deaths and account for 67,000 deaths every year. The collective five-year survival rate for those cancers is just 16%. For many of these less survivable cancers, survival rates in the UK lag behind other countries, with the UK ranked 29th out of 33 countries for pancreatic cancer survival.

Government Response

Ashley Dalton
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
Government Response
The Minister acknowledged the wide range of issues raised by MPs, including progress on less survivable cancers, rollout of non-specific symptom pathways, support for the Rare Cancers Bill, plans to tackle rare and less survivable cancers in the new cancer plan due early February, genomics investment, Jess’s rule for GPs, NHS pilot of Cytosponge test in pharmacies, palliative care service framework development, and improvements in diagnosis times with community diagnostic centres.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.