← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill
01 December 2025
Lead MP
Jamie Stone
Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross
LD
Responding Minister
Olivia Bailey
Tags
NHS
Word Count: 14199
Other Contributors: 14
At a Glance
Jamie Stone raised concerns about children’s wellbeing and schools bill in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
Jamie Stone calls for improvements to be made before the Bill progresses further, emphasizing the need for better consultation with local decision-makers and ensuring that the Bill respects parental rights and community autonomy.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
The e-petition created by Michelle Zaher highlights concerns about the lack of consultation with key stakeholders in the development of the Bill. Signatories believe that the Bill does not adequately address real problems in the education system and instead tightens controls on parents and educators without proper engagement.
Andrew Cooper
Con
Central Suffolk and North Ipswich
Asked Jamie Stone to confirm his understanding that standardised pay should be a floor rather than a ceiling for teachers in academies. Emphasises the importance of child protection measures in the Bill and highlights the introduction of a single unique identifier for every child to ensure secure sharing of essential information between agencies. He also stresses that school reform aims at creating conditions for success and improving standards across schools. Suggested that requiring parents to provide reasons for home education might flag up bullying or special educational needs issues at schools but raised concerns about burdening under-resourced local authorities. Asked if the Minister was aware that the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health supports using the NHS number as a single unique identifier despite concerns raised by other organisations.
Bradley Thomas
Con
Bromsgrove
Highlights the importance of understanding home education as a lifeline for children who do not fit within mainstream schooling, often due to being let down by the state education system. Joined in discussing homeschooling, focusing on safeguarding issues and supporting Gregory Stafford's points about the amendment tabled by Baroness Barran.
Chris Hinchliff
Lab
North East Hertfordshire
Echoed concerns about data security, protections for parental responsibility in education decisions, and ensuring the Bill does not force home educators into rigid school-style timetables.
Damian Hinds
Con
East Hampshire
Acknowledged the importance of the debate and praised the contributions made by MPs on all sides, emphasising the significance of hospital schools. Emphasised the success of Conservative policies in improving school standards and criticised Labour’s record in Wales, where children's performance is far behind England. Asked the Minister about the funding for breakfast clubs and clarified that schools receive £450 per year.
Gideon Amos
LD
Taunton and Wellington
Concerned about the Bill's impact on home education families, small rural schools, and data privacy. Emphasised that children are safer in home educating environments than at school.
Gregory Stafford
Lab
Plymouth, Moor View
Pointed out concerns raised by Amanda Spielman, former Ofsted chief inspector, about the potential negative impact of the Bill on children's education. Raises concerns about limiting branded items in school uniforms, arguing it may not be more cost-effective to buy non-branded items compared to bulk buying through a supplier. Concerned that mandatory registration for home education risks treating parents as potential safeguarding issues rather than recognising the best efforts of families. Asked if the opposition to national identity cards also applies to a digital ID for all children as proposed by the Bill. Discussed homeschooling, mentioning Sara Sharif's case and the amendment tabled by Baroness Barran on local authority consent for withdrawing from school under certain conditions.
Jamie Stone
LD
Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross
Acknowledged the debate was good but sparkier than anticipated, thanked Michelle Zaher for her petition which led to a broad discussion, recognised the work of the Petitions Committee in initiating Government responses.
John Whitby
Lab
Derbyshire Dales
Years of austerity have stripped out much of the vital support that young families once received. The number of children in care has risen by 28%, and the number of children living in poverty is now at 4 million.
Liam Conlon
Lab
Telford
Asked about the impact of the decimation of Sure Start on preparing children for their best start in life, citing concerns from primary school teachers.
Acknowledged the need for proper oversight but argued that the Bill's approach could stigmatise responsible, caring families and stretch already limited resources further. Expressed support for the Bill based on safeguarding concerns and highlighted the need for proper accountability and resourcing of local authorities to protect children effectively.
Munira Wilson
Lab
Twickenham
The petition was supported by approximately 166,500 people, including 184 from her constituency. She agreed with part 1 of the Bill that aims to better safeguard children but raised concerns about data sharing and security. Supported reducing branded uniform costs but proposed capping the cost instead of limiting items to reduce supplier price hikes.
Saqib Bhatti
Con
Meriden and Solihull East
Supports the petition calling for the withdrawal of the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, citing its inadequacies and potential damage to educational opportunities. Asked for clarification on the legislation regarding three branded items, particularly in primary versus secondary schools.
Julian Lewis
Con
New Forest East
Asked about concerns over the single identifier, citing advice from the General Medical Council against using the NHS number.
Will Forster
LD
Woking
Discussed the case of Sara Sharif and advocated for parents losing the right to home school due to safeguarding concerns.
Government Response
Olivia Bailey
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Education
Government Response
Acknowledged the contributions from colleagues and thanked those in the Public Gallery who have signed the petition. Highlighted that all Members share the ambition to ensure children are safe and get the best start in life. Clarified that breakfast clubs provide £450 savings per year and increased funding for schools. Stated the policy on limiting branded uniform items to three, with flexibility for school-specific needs such as sports club uniforms. Acknowledged concerns about data loss and digital ID, confirmed that the Government will pilot the use of NHS numbers as single unique identifiers in Wigan. Emphasised the importance of robust information sharing to keep children safe from harm.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.