← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
1994 RAF Chinook Crash
26 November 2025
Lead MP
Alex Easton
North Down
Ind
Responding Minister
Louise Sandher-Jones
Tags
Defence
Word Count: 12210
Other Contributors: 11
At a Glance
Alex Easton raised concerns about 1994 raf chinook crash in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
The hon. Member demands a full public inquiry with statutory powers to compel witnesses and access all relevant material including sealed documentation for clarity and justice.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
The crash on 2 June 1994 killed nine military officers, ten RUC special branch officers, five MI5 officers, a senior civil servant and four RAF members. The investigations have raised concerns over gaps in evidence, missing documents, incomplete briefings and withheld information.
Alex Easton
Lab
Berwick-upon-Tweed
Questions the sealing of Ministry of Defence documents for 100 years and the repeated ignoring of warnings, highlighting systematic failings in the Chinook Airworthiness Review Team reports. Asks about due diligence on MOD test authorities unable to recommend the aircraft for flying and the FADEC software described as “positively dangerous”. Emphasizes the need for justice and truth through a judge-led public inquiry.
Brendan O'Hara
SNP
Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber
Discussed the impact of the crash on his constituency and called for a judge-led inquiry based on 51,000 names presented to the Prime Minister in a petition.
Brendan O’Hara
SNP
Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber
The hon. Member acknowledges the deep impact of the crash on his constituency and highlights the need for an independent public inquiry with the power to compel evidence.
Carla Lockhart
DUP
Upper Bann
The tragic crash of a Chinook helicopter in 1994 left an indelible mark on the lives of many families, including 25 intelligence experts from Northern Ireland. The MOD has denied answers to families and withheld information behind the Official Secrets Act. Stressed the need for openness, trustworthiness, and finding out what happened without blaming anyone. Emphasised the loss to intelligence and security community due to significant inconsistencies in multiple investigations.
David Reed
Con
Exmouth and Exeter East
Paid tribute to the 29 victims and acknowledged the families' long fight for truth and justice. He supported clearing the pilots' names and called for a proper investigation into the crash.
Gavin Robinson
DUP
Belfast East
Agrees that this is an opportune time given the Hillsborough disaster and the law change to create a duty of candour, urging the government to seize the moment.
Jim Allister
TUV
North Antrim
Reiterates the insult caused by obfuscation and potential cover-ups with documents sealed for 100 years, questioning what there is to hide.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Acknowledges the hon. Member for North Down's speech, highlighting the importance of Chief Constable Jon Boutcher's support for a public inquiry. Emphasises the cross-party backing for justice and truth in relation to the victims' service. Apologises for missing out in previous speeches and highlights the time and energy bereaved families have had to put into getting basic answers.
Richard Foord
Con
Honiton and Sidmouth
Expresses gratitude to the hon. Member for securing the debate and offers support for the families' calls for a judge-led public inquiry. Supported the Public Office (Accountability) Bill and called for strengthening independent mechanisms to review sensitive decisions behind closed doors, urging the release of sealed Chinook documents where possible and a judge-led public inquiry. Talked about years of uncertainty and inconsistencies between multiple investigations over six inquiries which have not produced an acceptable response to families.
Julian Lewis
Con
New Forest East
Recalls history of trying to highlight rules on blaming dead airmen for gross negligence, noting changes since this case that ensure such cases won't happen again. Asked about possible embarrassment over decision to put many staff in a single aircraft, seeking specific date and nature of the decision.
Tessa Munt
Con
Wells and Mendip Hills
Families were never informed that important Ministry of Defence documents remain sealed for 100 years, a fact revealed by the BBC. This raises questions about transparency and accountability in government responses to such tragic events. Asked when the MOD stopped allowing critical personnel on one flight, given that it was not allowed for the royal family. She questioned why six inquiries have failed to bring clarity. Asked for clarity on who made the decision to seal documents and when that decision was made. Requested detailed information on the date and specifics of the decision made regarding placing multiple senior personnel on one airframe, emphasizing the need for transparency.
Government Response
Louise Sandher-Jones
The Minister for Veterans and People
Government Response
Explained that while the files are subject to a 100-year review, only 0.1% of documents contain information relevant to the cause of the crash; confirmed that most documents relate to personal data or compensation details; stated that these documents will be reviewed in 2029 and FOI-able with redacted personal details. Addressed concerns raised by MPs about accountability, transparency in investigations, and communication with affected families. Confirmed willingness to meet representatives from the Chinook Justice Campaign on December 16th to discuss further insights into the crash.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.